CIT v. Society for Promotion of Edn., Allahabad

67 Taxmann.com 264Supreme Court of India2016#6715 most cited
17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Society for Promotion of Edn., Allahabad

VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY,BELGAUM vs. CIT, BANGALORE

ITA 8/BANG/2016[N.A.]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri.Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : N.A. Visvesvaraya Technological University, The Commissioner Of Jnana Ganga Campus, Vs. Income-Tax (Exemptions), Belagavi. Bengaluru. Pan : Aaajv 0064 F Appellant Respondent : Shri. M.V. Seshachala, Sr. Standing Assessee By Counsel & Shri Shiva Prasad Reddy, I.T.P Revenue By : Shri Dilip, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.11.2022 O R D E R Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Arises Out Of Order Dated 28/01/2021, Passed By Hon’Ble Karnataka High Court In Ita No.825/2018. Brief Facts Of The Case Are As Under: 2. In The First Round Of Appeal The Assessee Raised Following Grounds Before This Tribunal Against Order Passed By The Ld.Cit(E), Dated 08/12/2015: 1. The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income- Tax (Exemptions), Bengaluru [Hereinafter Referred To As The Cit(E)] Under Section 12A Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The I-T Act), To The Extent It Is Not Retrospective In Effect, Is Arbitrary, Erroneous, Unreasonable & Opposed To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & The Law.

For Respondent: Shri. M.V. Seshachala, Sr. Standing
Section 10(23)(C)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(a)Section 80G

…nuineness of activities of trust in accordance with its objects and not about credential, capacity and qualification, etc., of trust. 13.Our attention was also invited to judgments of Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. Society for promotion of education [2016] 67 Taxmann.com 264 (SC.) in which their Lordship have held that where the application for registration is not responded to within six months, application for registration was deemed to have been taken effect from the end of the 6 Page 7 month from the date of filing of application. The relevant observation of the Hon’ble Apex Court is extracted hereunder fo…

CIT v. Society for Promotion of Edn., Allahabad (67 Taxmann.com 264) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax