CIT v. Shadiram Balmukund

84 ITR 183High Court1972#4894 most cited

What is CIT v. Shadiram Balmukund authority for?

Penalty proceedings are vitiated if the Assessing Officer's satisfaction is not based on the order passed by the Assessing Officer or the CIT(A). The jurisdiction to impose penalty rests with the authority that is satisfied about the concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.

24

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v Shadiram Balmukund · 84 ITR 183 · penalty proceedings · satisfaction of officer · natural justice · jurisdiction · section 271(1)(c) · section 270A

Judgments citing CIT v. Shadiram Balmukund

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 NANDED, NANDED vs. SATYAWAN ARJUNRAO SHINDE, OSMANABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2109/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2109/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Ito, Ward-1, Nanded. Vs. Satyawan Arjunrao Shinde, Nagar Accident Hospital, Gore Complex, Samta Nagar, Osmanabad- 413501. Pan : Baeps8869J Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Arvind Desai Assessee By : Shri B. P. Jaju Date Of Hearing : 02.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 06.08.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A), Pune-12 [‘Ld. Cit(A)’] For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Failed To Appreciate The Facts That The Assessee Has Suppressed Professional Receipts Not Shown In His Itr, Ld. Cit(A)-12, Pune Vide Letter Dtd.02/01/2023 Directed That Penalty Proceedings U/S 270A Of The Act May Be Initiated By The Ao At The Time Of Giving Effect To The Appeal Order Dtd.28/11/2022. Accordingly Ao Initiated Penalty Proceedings As Per Clause (E) Of Sub-Section 9 Of Section 270A Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri B. P. JajuFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 133ASection 2Section 270ASection 270A(1)Section 274Section 9

…Assessing Officer's failure to pin point the relevant clauses (a) to (f) to sub section (9); while initiating the proceedings herein u/s 270A(8) of the act, thereby alleging under reporting of income as a sequence of misreporting b) CIT Vs Shadiram Balmukund (84 ITR 183 Allahabad) In this case it is held that there must be satisfaction of respective officer. Penalty order is to be passed on the basis of the order passed by that authority i.e. A.O., or CIT(A). The action of CIT(A) is unjustified and against the natural justice.. 3.5 Having gone through the relevant material on record and the decisions of above jud…

Showing 120 of 24 · Page 1 of 2

CIT v. Shadiram Balmukund (84 ITR 183) — Cited in 24 Judgments | BharatTax