CIT v. Shadiram Balmukund
84 ITR 183High Court1972#4894 most cited
What is CIT v. Shadiram Balmukund authority for?
Penalty proceedings are vitiated if the Assessing Officer's satisfaction is not based on the order passed by the Assessing Officer or the CIT(A). The jurisdiction to impose penalty rests with the authority that is satisfied about the concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
24
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v Shadiram Balmukund · 84 ITR 183 · penalty proceedings · satisfaction of officer · natural justice · jurisdiction · section 271(1)(c) · section 270A
Sections most often in play
Judgments citing CIT v. Shadiram Balmukund
Showing 1–20 of 24 · Page 1 of 2