CIT v. Sai Metal Works

11 Taxmann.com 61Reported decision#10314 most cited
10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Section 115BBESection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 37(1)Section 40A(3)Section 69ASection 132

Issues it is cited on

prohibited by lawsection 40a(3)section 145(3)section 40asearch assessmentsection 153dsection 37(1)double taxationsection 40section 37unexplained moneysection 139(1)

Judgments citing CIT v. Sai Metal Works

SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED,TRICHY vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1471/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED,TRICHY vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1470/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED,TRICHY vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1469/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED,TRICHY vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1468/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED,TRICHY vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1467/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1432/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1431/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1430/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1429/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. SEBCO PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED, TRICHY

In the result, all the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 1428/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1428/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1429/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1430/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2019-20) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1431/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2020-21) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1432/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit M/S Sebco Property Private Limited बनाम/ Central Circle-2, 24D, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Vs. Trichy. K.K. Nagar, Trichy-620 021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaocs-0810-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1467/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1468/Chny/2024 (िनधा'रणवष' / Assessment Year: 2018-19) &

For Appellant: Shri R. Venkata Raman (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

…ratio. Therefore, the separate disallowance as made by Ld. AO u/s 37(1) and 40A(3) has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). We order so. The Ld. CIT-DR has referred to the decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sai Metal Works (11 Taxmann.com 61) for the submission that disallowance u/s 40A(3) could still be made in the given situation. Upon study, we find the same to be contextually different. In that decision, the Hon’ble Court primarily held that the provisions of Sec. 40A(3) would apply to block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B also. The same is not the case here and…