ASST CIT CIR 6(1), MUMBAI vs. ANIL PRINERS LTD, MUMBAI
The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 5859/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Mar 2016AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajendraassessment Year-2009-10 Acit, Anil Printers Ltd. Circle-6(1), R. No.506, 2, Kakad Industrial Estate, बनाम/ 5Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Matunga West, Vs. M.K.Road, Mumbai-400016 Mumbai-400020 Pan No.Aacca6914C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
Section 114JSection 139(1)Section 139(3)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 32(2)Section 32oSection 42Section 80
…367 (Cal.) and CIT vs Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. (1973) 89 ITR 77 (Bom.). This is so because unabsorbed depreciation retains its own character even in succeeding year(s) as distinguished from current depreciation (CIT vs Ravi Industries Ltd. ) (1963) 49 ITR 145, 155 (Bom.). The 13 Hon’ble Madras High Court in Seshasayee Paper & bonds Ltd. vs DCIT(2005) 272 ITR 165 (Mad.) held that under section 32(2) a legal fiction has been created that unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier year shall form part of current year’s disallowance and therefore it shall have to dealt with accordingly subject to the provisio…