CIT v. Rakesh Ramani

94 Taxmann.com 461High Court2018#7534 most cited

What is CIT v. Rakesh Ramani authority for?

Additions cannot be sustained solely on the basis of a statement made under Section 132 if the assessee later provides evidence to disprove the statement, especially if books of account are not rejected. Evidence supporting the assessee's case can be produced during assessment proceedings, not just at the time of seizure.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Rakesh Ramani · Section 132 · search and seizure · block assessment · additions · evidence · books of accounts · assessment proceedings · onus of proof

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Rakesh Ramani

Devendra Rajnikant Ladhani, Mumbai vs. ACIT, Central Circ;E-3, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 178/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadala & Shri Gagan Goyaldevendra Rajnikant Ladhani, 1, Om Building, Opp. Rishi Vihar Complex, Bolinj Road, Virar (W), District-Palghar-401303 Pan: Abfpl5079C ...... Appellant Vs. Acit, Central Circle-3, 6Th Floor, Ashar It Park, Wagle Industrial Estate, Road No.16X, Thane (West)-400604. ..... Respondent Appellant By : Sh. Subhodh Ratnaparkhi Respondent By : Sh. Nimesh Yadav, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 09/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 03/08/2022 Order Per Gagan Goyal, A.M: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -11, Pune [Hereinafter Referred To As (‘Ld. Cit(A)’) Dated 30.12.2020 For The Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Hon. Cit(A) Erred In Upholding The Addition Of Rs.3,82,84,000/- Made U/S 69A Of The It. Act, 1961 As Unexplained Money On Account Of Cash Found At The Residence & From The Bank Lockers Of The Appellant During The Course Of 2 Ita No. 178/Mum/2021- Devendra Ranjikant Ladhani

For Appellant: Sh. Subhodh RatnaparkhiFor Respondent: Sh. Nimesh Yadav, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Devendra Rajnikant Ladhani, 1, Om Building, Opp. Rishi Vihar Complex, Bolinj Road, Virar (W), District-Palghar-401303 PAN: ABFPL5079C ...... Appellant Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3, 6th Floor, Ashar IT Park, Wagle Industrial Estate, Road No.16X, Thane (West)-400604. ..... Respondent Appellant by : Sh. Subhodh Ratnaparkhi Respondent by : Sh. Nimesh Yadav, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 09/05/2022 Date of pronouncement : 03/08/2022 ORDER PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M: This appeal by…

CIT v. Rakesh Ramani (94 Taxmann.com 461) — Cited in 15 Judgments | BharatTax