SAKET AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 2(3) JAIPUR, JAIPUR
In the result appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 646/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Oct 2024AY 2014-15
Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Ms. Satwika Jhan, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam (CIT) a
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 41(1)
…would not have paid any interest and that too year after year. Therefore, the liabilities, in our view, certainly did not cease to exist in the year under appeal. 21. The Delhi High Court, in the case of CIT v. Rajasthan Golden Transport Co. (P.) Ltd. (2001) 249 ITR 723 (Del), held that if 20 Saket Agarwal vs. ITO amount is received in the course of a trading transaction, even though it is not taxable in the year of receipt as being of revenue character, the amount changes its character when the amount becomes the assessees own money because of limitation or by any other statutory or contractual right. When suc…