CIT v. R.M.P. Plasto (P.) Ltd.
184 Taxmann 372Supreme Court of India2009#4141 most cited
What is CIT v. R.M.P. Plasto (P.) Ltd. authority for?
Penalty for concealment of income under Section 271(1)(c) is justified if the positive income of the assessee is reduced to nil after allowing set-off of carried forward losses of earlier years.
29
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2023.
Also referred to as
CIT v. R.M.P. Plasto · Section 271(1)(c) · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · set-off of carried forward losses · penalty justification · Supreme Court
Also reported as
313 ITR 397227 CTR 635
Judgments citing CIT v. R.M.P. Plasto (P.) Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2