What is CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd. authority for?

Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) expenses are an allowable business deduction. Such costs are to be recognized and deducted over the vesting period, as they are not considered contingent in nature.

How many judgments cite CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd.?

143 judgments on BharatTax cite CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd. (211 Taxmann 554), spanning 2015 to 2026.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd. come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 37(1), Section 143(3), Section 153A, Section 250, Section 115JB, Section 132.

CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd. (211 Taxmann 554)

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed as indicated above

ITA 5465/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 10ASection 143Section 144Section 144C(13)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, C: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.5624/Del/2010 & 5465/Del/2011 [Assessment Years: 2006-07 and 2007-08] HCL Technologies Limited, Asst. Commissioner of 806, Siddhartha 96, Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Nehru Place, New Delhi. Vs New Delhi. PAN- AAACH1645P Assessee Revenue Assessee by Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv., Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv., Shri Aditya Vohra, Adv., Shri Arpit Goyal, CA & Shri Shashvat Dhamija, Adv. Revenue by Shri G.C. Srivastava, Special Counsel (VC), Shri Kalrav Malhotra, Adv…

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed as indicated above

ITA 5624/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 10ASection 143Section 144Section 144C(13)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, C: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.5624/Del/2010 & 5465/Del/2011 [Assessment Years: 2006-07 and 2007-08] HCL Technologies Limited, Asst. Commissioner of 806, Siddhartha 96, Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Nehru Place, New Delhi. Vs New Delhi. PAN- AAACH1645P Assessee Revenue Assessee by Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv., Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv., Shri Aditya Vohra, Adv., Shri Arpit Goyal, CA & Shri Shashvat Dhamija, Adv. Revenue by Shri G.C. Srivastava, Special Counsel (VC), Shri Kalrav Malhotra, Adv…

FAIRBRIDGE CAPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MUMBAI - 6, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3626/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

For Appellant: \nMs. Chandni Shah a/w Mr. Hardik Nirmal andFor Respondent: \nShri Vivek Perampurna, CIT, D/R [virtually

Section 143(3)Section 263

…{ "clean_text": "। आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण न्यायपीठ, मुंबई ।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n“F” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON'BLE VICE PRESIDENT\n&\nSHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nI.T.A. No. 3626/Mum/2025\n Assessment Year: 2020-21\nPrincipal Commissioner of\nFairbridge Capital Private Limited\nVs\nIncome-tax, Mumbai - 6\nC, 6th Floor, Cnergy\nAppasaheb Marathe Marg\nMaharashtra - 400025\n[PAN: AABCF7607C]\nअपीलार्थी/ (Appellant)\nप्रत्यर्थी / (Respondent)\nAssessee by:\nMs. Chandni Shah a/w Mr. Hardik Nirmal and\nMr. Kinjal Patel, A/Rs\nRevenue by:\nShri Vivek Peramp…

M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands\ndismissed

ITA 321/MUM/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain&\Nshri Prabhash Shankar\N\Ni.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\N\Npatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs\Nknown As Ruchi Soya\Nindustries Ltd)\N616, Tulsiani Chambers,\Nnariman Point, Mumbai\Npan - Aaacr2892L\Ndy. Cit, Cc – 7(2)\N655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar\Nbhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai\N400020.\N(Appellant)\N(Respondent)\N\Ni.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\Ndy. Cit, Cc – 7(2)\N655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar\Nbhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai\N400020.\N(Appellant)\Nvs\Npatanjali\Nfood\Nltd\N(Formerly Known As Ruchi\Nsoya Industries Ltd)\N616, Tulsiani Chambers,\Nnariman Point, Mumbai\Npan – Aaacr2892L\N(Respondent)\N\Nassessee By\Nrevenue By\Ndate Of Hearing\Ndate Of Pronouncement\N\Nshri Ss Nagar (Virtually Appeared) &\Nshri B Maheshwari\Nshri Ra Dhyani, Cit Dr\N11.08.2025\N15.09.2025\N\Norder\N\Nper: Shri. Sandeep Gosain, J.M.:\Nthe Present Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee\Nchallenging The Different Impugned Orders Passed Under\Nsection 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act'), By The\Nnational Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) / Cit(A) For The\N Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2011-12.\N\N2. Since All The Issues Involved In These Two Appeals Are\Ncommon & Identical, Therefore, They Have Been Clubbed,\Nheard Together & Consolidated Order Is Being Passed For\Nthe Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.\N\Nita No. 319/Mum/2023, A.Y 2007-08\N\N3. At The Time Of Hearing Ld.Ar Stated At Bar That Assessee\Nwants To Withdraw The Present Appeal. Therefore, Considering\Nthe Statement Of The Ld.Ar, The Present Appeal Filed By The\Nassessee Stands Dismissed As Withdrawn.\N\N3.

Section 132Section 153ASection 250Section 37(1)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER &\nSHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\n\nI.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\n\nPatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs\nKnown as Ruchi Soya\nIndustries Ltd)\n616, Tulsiani Chambers,\nNariman Point, Mumbai\nPAN - AAACR2892L\nDy. CIT, CC – 7(2)\n655, 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, MK Road, Mumbai\n400020.\n(Appellant)\n(Respondent)\n\nI.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\nDy. CIT, CC – 7(2)\n655, 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, MK Road, Mumbai\n400020.\n(Appellant)\nVs\…

PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands\ndismissed

ITA 319/MUM/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Sept 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain&\Nshri Prabhash Shankar\N\Ni.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\Npatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs Dy. Cit, Cc – 7(2)\Nknown As Ruchi Soya 655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar\Nindustries Ltd) Bhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai\N616, Tulsiani Chambers, 400020.\Nnariman Point, Mumbai\Npan - Aaacr2892L\N(Respondent)\N(Appellant)\N\Ni.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\Ndy. Cit, Cc – 7(2) Vs Patanjali Food Ltd\N655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar (Formerly Known As Ruchi\Nbhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai Soya Industries Ltd)\N400020.\N616, Tulsiani Chambers,\N(Appellant) Nariman Point, Mumbai\Npan – Aaacr2892L\N(Respondent)\N\Nassessee By Shri Ss Nagar (Virtually Appeared) &\Nshri B Maheshwari\Nrevenue By Shri Ra Dhyani, Cit Dr\Ndate Of Hearing 11.08.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement 15.09.2025\N\Norder\N\Nper: Shri. Sandeep Gosain, J.M.:\N\Nthe Present Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee\Nchallenging The Different Impugned Orders Passed Under\Nsection 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act'), By The\Nnational Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) / Cit(A) For The\N Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2011-12.\N\N2. Since All The Issues Involved In These Two Appeals Are\Ncommon & Identical, Therefore, They Have Been Clubbed,\Nheard Together & Consolidated Order Is Being Passed For\N\Nthe Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.\N\Nita No. 319/Mum/2023, A.Y 2007-08\N\N3. At The Time Of Hearing Ld.Ar Stated At Bar That Assessee\Nwants To Withdraw The Present Appeal. Therefore, Considering\Nthe Statement Of The Ld.Ar, The Present Appeal Filed By The\Nassessee Stands Dismissed As Withdrawn.\N\N3.

Section 132Section 153ASection 250Section 37(1)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI\n\nBEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER &\nSHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\n\nI.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\nPatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs Dy. CIT, CC – 7(2)\nKnown as Ruchi Soya 655, 6th Floor, Aayakar\nIndustries Ltd) Bhavan, MK Road, Mumbai\n616, Tulsiani Chambers, 400020.\nNariman Point, Mumbai\nPAN - AAACR2892L\n(Respondent)\n(Appellant)\n\nI.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\nDy. CIT, CC – 7(2) Vs Patanjali Food Ltd\n655, 6th Floor, Aayakar (Formerly Known as Ruchi\nBhavan,…

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1174/MUM/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023 A.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12 Patanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs Dy. CIT, CC – 7(2) Known as Ruchi Soya 655, 6th Floor, Aayakar Industries Ltd) Bhavan, MK Road, Mumbai 616, Tulsiani Chambers, – 400020. Nariman Point, Mumbai PAN – AAACR2892L (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023 A.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12 Dy. CIT, CC – 7(2) Vs Patanjali Food Ltd 655, 6th Floor, Aayakar (Formerly Known as Ruchi Bhavan, MK Road, Mumbai – Soya Industries Ltd)…

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1173/MUM/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023 A.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12 Patanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs Dy. CIT, CC – 7(2) Known as Ruchi Soya 655, 6th Floor, Aayakar Industries Ltd) Bhavan, MK Road, Mumbai 616, Tulsiani Chambers, – 400020. Nariman Point, Mumbai PAN – AAACR2892L (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023 A.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12 Dy. CIT, CC – 7(2) Vs Patanjali Food Ltd 655, 6th Floor, Aayakar (Formerly Known as Ruchi Bhavan, MK Road, Mumbai – Soya Industries Ltd)…

DCIT CEN CIR 1(4), MUMBAI vs. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the assessee are partly allowed, and the additional ground of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 4069/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri J.D. Mistry – Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta - CIT DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 260ASection 43BSection 45Section 801ASection 801A(4)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A No.2897/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) Grasim Industries Limited vs Deputy CIT, Central Circle- 1(4), (Corporate Finance Division) Mumbai. A-2, Aditya Birla Centre Room No. 902, Old CGO Building, S.K. Ahire Marge, Worli, Mumbai, 400020 Mumbai-400 030 PAN: AAACG4464B APPELLANT RESPONDENT I.T.A No.4069/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) Deputy CIT, Central Circle- vs Grasim Industries Limited 1(4), Mumbai (Corporate Finance Division) Room No…

GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-1(4), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the assessee are partly allowed,\nand the additional ground of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2897/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 260ASection 43BSection 45Section 801ASection 801A(4)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nMUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI\nBEFORE SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND\nSHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER\n\nI.T.A No.2897/Mum/2016\n(Assessment Year: 2010-11)\n\nGrasim Industries Limited\n(Corporate Finance Division)\nA-2, Aditya Birla Centre\nS.K. Ahire Marge, Worli,\nMumbai-400 030\nPAN: AAACG4464B\nAPPELLANT\nVS\nDeputy CIT, Central Circle-1(4),\nMumbai.\nRoom No. 902, Old CGO Building,\nMumbai, 400020\nRESPONDENT\n\nI.T.A No.4069/Mum/2016\n(Assessment Year: 2010-11)\n\nDeputy CIT, Central Circle-1(4),\nMumbai\nRoom No. 902, Old CGO…

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-18, DELHI, DELHI vs. M/S DELHIVERY LIMITED , DELHI

In the result ground no 8 of the appeal is allowed

ITA 585/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms Pooja Swaroop, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITAs No.585 & 573/Del/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2020-21 DCIT, Vs M/s Delhivery Limited, Central Circle-18, N24- N34, S24-S34, Air Cargo Delhi. Logistics Centre-II, Opposite Gate No.6, Cargo Terminal, IGI Airport, Delhi. PAN: AAPCS9575E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri K.M. Gupta, Advocate; Ms Shruti Khimta, Advocate; & Shri Jaskaran, CA Revenue by : Ms Pooja Swaroop, CIT-DR & Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 07.08.2025 D…

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-18, DELHI, DELHI vs. M/S DELHIVERY LIMITED , DELHI

In the result ground no 8 of the appeal is allowed

ITA 573/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms Pooja Swaroop, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITAs No.585 & 573/Del/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2020-21 DCIT, Vs M/s Delhivery Limited, Central Circle-18, N24- N34, S24-S34, Air Cargo Delhi. Logistics Centre-II, Opposite Gate No.6, Cargo Terminal, IGI Airport, Delhi. PAN: AAPCS9575E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri K.M. Gupta, Advocate; Ms Shruti Khimta, Advocate; & Shri Jaskaran, CA Revenue by : Ms Pooja Swaroop, CIT-DR & Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 07.08.2025 D…

DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), KOLKATA vs. BANDHAN BANK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 242/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Mar 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Us With The Following Grounds:

Section 17(2)(vi)Section 250Section 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 242/Kol/2024 (Assessment Year 2020-21) DCIT, Circle-5(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, 8th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata – 700069 ..............…...…………….... Appellant vs. Bandhan Bank Ltd., Kolkata, DN-32, Sector-V, Salt Lake, Kolkata – 700091 [PAN: AAGCB1323G] ..….............................. Respondent Appearances by: Assessee represented by : Biswanath Paul, FCA Department represented by : P.N. Barnwal, CIT-DR Date of concluding the hearing : 10.02.202…

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NFAC, , DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1569/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1569/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20 Indian Overseas Bank, The Principal Commissioner Of 763, Anna Salai, V. Income Tax, Anna Road, Chennai -4, Chennai – 600 002. Chennai -600 034. [Pan: Aaaci-1223-J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. C. Naresh, Ca : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.12.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha:

For Appellant: Shri. C. Naresh, CA

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 41Section 41(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "याियक सद"य एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 1569/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20 Indian Overseas Bank, The Principal Commissioner of 763, Anna Salai, v. Income Tax, Anna Road, Chennai -4, Chennai – 600 002. Chennai -600 034. [PAN: AAACI-1223-J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant by : Shri. C. Naresh, CA : Shri. Nil…

M/S. BANDHAN BANK LTD. (ERSTWHILE GHOSH FINANCE LTD),KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-5(1), KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 465/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Biswanath Paul, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Subhro Das, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 17(2)(vi)Section 192Section 250Section 37

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s Bandhan Bank Limited, Deputy Commissioner of (Erstwhile Gruh Finance Income Tax – 5(1), Kolkata, Limited Merged with Bandhan Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Bank Ltd. w.e.f 01.01.2019), Vs Chowringhee Square, DN-32, Salt Lake City, Sector-V, Kolkata - 700069 Kolkata - 700091 (PAN: AAACG7010K) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri Biswanath Paul, FCA Respondent by : Shri Subhro Das, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 11.07.2024 Date of Pr…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), AHMEDABAD vs. ASTRAL LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ground number 2 of the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 921/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: The First Appellate Authority Which Has Been Decided By The Ld. Cit(A) Vide The Impugned Order. The Revenue Is In Appeal Us Before Us.

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Pratik Sharma, Sr. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 14ASection 92C

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH Before: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member And Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Accountant Member Assessment Year 2018-19 The DCIT, Astral Limited Central Circle-1(1), 207/1, Astral House, Ahmedabad Vs B/H Rajpath Club (Appellant) Off S.G. Highway, Ahmedabad-380059 PAN: AABCA2951N (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R. Revenue by: Shri Pratik Sharma, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 22-05-2024 Date of pronouncement : 04-06-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(2), DELHI, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI vs. CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 3489/DEL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kshitij Bansal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Kumar Upadhyay, Sr. DR

Section 37(1)

…herefore be allowed. In support of his arguments, the assessee relied upon the following decisions: (i) Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in case of CIT v. Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. ITA 107/2015 (ii) Hon'ble High Court of Madras CIT vs PVP Ventures Ltd. [2012] 211 Taxmann 554 (iii) Bangalore Special Bench in case of Biocon Ltd 144 ITD 21 (Bang) iv) ITAT Delhi ACIT v Cvent India Pvt Ltd ITA no 523/Del/2020 10. Per contra the ld. DR relied upon the order of the Assessing Officer. 11. After hearing the rival submission and perusing the relevant material on record, we find that the issue of allowability of expense o…

M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal and cross objections of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 320/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Nagar & Shri BFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) DCIT, Central Circle-7(2) बिधम/ M/s. Patanjali Foods Ltd Room No. 637, 6th Floor, (Formerly known as Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Ruchi Soya Industries Road, Mumbai-400020. Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. Cross objection No.51/…

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal and cross objections of the assessee are

ITA 1176/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Dcit, Central Circle-7(2) Room No. 637, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. बनाम / M/S. Patanjali Foods Ltd Vs. (Formerly Known As Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. Cross Objection No.51/Mum/2023 (Arising Out Of I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023) (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S. Patanjali Foods Ltd (Formerly Known As Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. बनाम / Dcit, Central Circle-7(2) Vs. Room No. 637, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 320/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Patanjali Foods Ltd (Formerly Known As Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) बनाम / Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-7(2) Room No. 637, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaci1220M 2

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Nagar & Shri BFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) DCIT, Central Circle-7(2) Room No. 637, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. बनाम / M/s. Patanjali Foods Ltd Vs. (Formerly known as Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. Cross objection No.51/…

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

ITA 1175/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Dcit, Central Circle-7(2) Room No. 637, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. बनाम / M/S. Patanjali Foods Ltd Vs. (Formerly Known As Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. Cross Objection No.51/Mum/2023 (Arising Out Of I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023) (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S. Patanjali Foods Ltd (Formerly Known As Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. बनाम / Dcit, Central Circle-7(2) Vs. Room No. 637, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 320/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Patanjali Foods Ltd (Formerly Known As Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) बनाम / Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-7(2) Room No. 637, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaci1220M 2

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Nagar & Shri BFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) DCIT, Central Circle-7(2) Room No. 637, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020. बनाम / M/s. Patanjali Foods Ltd Vs. (Formerly known as Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. Cross objection No.51/…

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal and cross objections of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1172/MUM/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Nagar & Shri BFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1172/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1175/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A. No. 1176/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) DCIT, Central Circle-7(2) बिधम/ M/s. Patanjali Foods Ltd Room No. 637, 6th Floor, (Formerly known as Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Ruchi Soya Industries Road, Mumbai-400020. Ltd) 616, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. Cross objection No.51/…

CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd.

What is CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd. authority for?

Also referred to as

Also reported as

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd.

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

FAIRBRIDGE CAPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MUMBAI - 6, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA

M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

DCIT CEN CIR 1(4), MUMBAI vs. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-1(4), MUMBAI

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-18, DELHI, DELHI vs. M/S DELHIVERY LIMITED , DELHI

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-18, DELHI, DELHI vs. M/S DELHIVERY LIMITED , DELHI

DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), KOLKATA vs. BANDHAN BANK LTD, KOLKATA

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NFAC, , DELHI

M/S. BANDHAN BANK LTD. (ERSTWHILE GHOSH FINANCE LTD),KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-5(1), KOL, KOLKATA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), AHMEDABAD vs. ASTRAL LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(2), DELHI, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI vs. CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI

M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI

DCIT, CC-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD.,( FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,, MUMBAI