ACIT 25(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S AMRUT ENTERPRISES , MUMBAI
Appeal of the Assessee is allowed and revenue appeal is dismissed
ITA 1215/MUM/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Jan 2023AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.1215/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Acit 25(2) Mumbai. Amrut Enterprises. Room No. 220, 2Nd Flr, 203, Avon Arcade, Dasrathlal बिधम/ Kautilya Bhavan Bkc Road, Vile Parle(W), Vs. Bandra(E), Mumbai- Mumbai- 400056 400051 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No Aaofa3252E (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.1017 & 1018/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15 & 2015-16) Amrut Enterprises. Jcit 25(2), Mumbai. Room 203, Avon Arcade, No. 502, 5Th Flr, Pratyakshar बिधम/ Dasrathlal Road, Vile Bhavan, Bkc, Bandra(E), Parle(W), Mumbai-400051 Vs. Mumbai- 400056 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No Aaofa3252E (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri R. S Khandelwal & Shri Nilkanth Khandelwal प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Manoj Sonha, Sr.Ar. सुनवाईकीतारीख/ 04.10.2022 : Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / 02.01.2023 : Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Amit Shukla:
For Appellant: Shri R. S Khandelwal & ShriFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Sonha, Sr.AR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 24
…the issue of taxability of mesne profits was raised before the Assessing Officer much before the completion of the assessment and therefore, in light of the judgment of Hon‟ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Pruthvi Brokers and Share holders 394 ITR 336 (Bom)”, and decision of Delhi High Court in Jai parabolic reported in 306 ITR 42, he held that, such a claim can be entertained at the appellate stage. Accordingly, we are in agreement with the order of the Ld. CIT(A), that this issue can be raised at the appellate stage an accordingly, ground No.1 raised by the revenue is dismissed. 18. The cor…
