CIT v. Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed
438 ITR 288Supreme Court of India2021#2570 most cited
What is CIT v. Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed authority for?
When a statutory provision is unambiguous and capable of only one meaning, it must be given effect in its own terms, and nothing should be added to or taken away from the plain language of the Act by way of interpretation.
46
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed · 438 ITR 288 · 131 Taxmann.com 94 · Supreme Court 2021 · statutory interpretation · literal rule · plain meaning rule · casus omissus · income tax act · section 143(3) · section 153A
Also reported as
131 Taxmann.com 94
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed
Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3