CIT v. Modi Industrial Corpn

195 Taxmann 68High Court2010#6293 most cited

What is CIT v. Modi Industrial Corpn authority for?

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied when income is determined on an estimate basis, as this does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars.

18

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Modi Industrial Corpn · section 271(1)(c) · penalty · concealment of income · inaccurate particulars · estimate basis · estimation of income · levy of penalty

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Modi Industrial Corpn

ANUP A. SHAH,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 106/RJT/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Mar 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 106/Rjt/2017 िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/Asstt. Years: 2005-2006 वष"

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agrawal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 40A

…अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ "यायपीठ "यायपीठ "यायपीठ आयकर आयकर अपी आयकर आयकर अपी अपीलीय अपी लीय लीय अिधकरण लीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद अिधकरण अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, (Conducted through E-Court, Rajkot) BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And Ms MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 106/Rjt/2017 िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/Asstt. Years: 2005-2006 वष" Anup A. Shah, A.C.I.T, C/o Gujarat Trading Company, Vs. Circle-2, “Mangal Bhuwan”, Rajkot. Nr. Nirmala Convent, Kalawad Road, Rajkot. PAN: AFHPS6475H Assessee by : Shri Chetan Agrawal, A.R Revenue by : Shr…

CIT v. Modi Industrial Corpn (195 Taxmann 68) — Cited in 18 Judgments | BharatTax