CIT v. Lumax Industries Ltd.

171 Taxmann 81High Court2008#3569 most cited
34

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Lumax Industries Ltd.

DY CIT CC 6 (1), MUMBAI vs. M/S VVF LTD., MUMBAI

Appeal is Allowed

ITA 6908/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Aug 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. No. 6908/Mum/2019 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Dcit Cc – 6(1) M/S Vvf Ltd. R. No. 1905, 19Th Floor बिाम/ Plot No. 109, Opp. Sion(E), Air India Building, Nariman Point Mumbai-400 022 Vs. Mumbai-400 021 स्थायीलेखा िं./ जीआइआर िं./ Pan/Gir No. Aaacv-3847-R (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Revenue By : Ms. Usha Gaikwad, Ld. Sr. Dr Assessee By : Shri Madhur Aggarwal, Ld. Ar ुनवाई की तारीख/ : 09/08/2021 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 09/08/2021 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Revenue For Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17 Arises Out Of The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-54, Mumbai [Cit(A)], Dated 23/08/2019 In The Matter Of Assessment Framed By Learned Assessing Officer (Ao) U/S 143(3) On 27/12/2018. The Revenue Is Aggrieved By The Fact The Addition Of Rs.250 Lacs U/S 36(1)(Ii) Made By Ld. Ao While Framing The Assessment Order Has Been Deleted In The Impugned Order.

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Aggarwal, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Usha Gaikwad, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 114Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(ii)

…1 आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “एफ” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय श्री महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष एवुं माननीय श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल ,लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. No. 6908/Mum/2019 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) DCIT CC – 6(1) M/s VVF Ltd. R. No. 1905, 19th floor बिाम/ Plot No. 109, Opp. Sion(E), Air India Building, Nariman Point Mumbai-400 022 Vs. Mumbai-400 021 स्थायीलेखा िं./ जीआइआर िं./ PAN/GIR No. AAACV-3847-R (अपीलाथी/Appel…

HEIDELBERG CEMENT INDIA LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2054/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2011-12 Heidelberg Cement India Ltd., Vs Dcit, 9Th Floor, Tower-C, Circle-2, 3Rd Floor, Infinity Towers, Dlf Cyber City, Vanijya Nikunj, Gurgaon. Hsiidc Building, Udyog Vihar, Ph. V, Pan: Aabcm2359J Near Shankar Chowk, Nh-8, Gurgaon. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Deepak Chopra, Advocate & Sh. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocate Revenue By : Ms Ashima Neb, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 28.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.10.2019 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 1St February, 2016 Of The Cit(A)-1, Gurgaon, Relating To Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Grounds Of Appeal No. 1 & 1.1 Raised By The Read As Under:- “1. The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred On Facts & In Law, In Confirming The Disallowance Made By The Ld. Ao, Amounting To Inr 87,12,690/-, On Account Of Additional Depreciation Claimed By The Appellant On New Plant & Machinery In Accordance With The Provisions Of Section 32(I)(Iia) Of The Act. 1.1 The Ld. Cit(A) / Ld. Ao Erred On Facts & In Law, In Considering Only The Nomenclature Of The Assets To Hold The Disallowance, Without Appreciating The Detailed Nature & Use Of The Assets.”

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Chopra, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Ashima Neb, Sr. DR
Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Heidelberg Cement India Ltd., Vs DCIT, 9th Floor, Tower-C, Circle-2, 3rd Floor, Infinity Towers, DLF Cyber City, Vanijya Nikunj, Gurgaon. HSIIDC Building, Udyog Vihar, Ph. V, PAN: AABCM2359J Near Shankar Chowk, NH-8, Gurgaon. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Deepak Chopra, Advocate & Sh. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocate Revenue by : Ms Ashima Neb, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 28.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 31.10.2019 ORDER PER R.K.…

Showing 120 of 34 · Page 1 of 2