JM FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD,MUMBAI vs. JCIT (OSD) 4(3), MUMBAI
Accordingly dismissed. However, in view of our findings given above, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed
ITA 3654/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. J.M. Financial Services The Joint Commissioner Of Ltd., Income-Tax (Osd)-4(3), (Formerly Jm Financial Room No.635, Services Pvt. Ltd.), Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. 7Th Floor, Cnergy, M.K. Road, Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Mumbai - 400020 Prabhadevi, Mumbai – 400 025 Pan: Aaacj5977A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri K. Shivaram, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Alok Johri, D.R
Section 14A
…the profit from derivative transactions and only the net loss can be disallowed under Explanation to section 73. In this regard, reliance is also placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Lokmat Newspapers (P.) Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 43 (Born) where in it has been held that the Explanation applied whether there is a profit or loss. The Ld. AO, therefore, erred on facts and in law in considering a part of the arbitrage transaction as deemed speculation loss as per Expin. to Sec.73. In view of the facts as explained above it is held that the appellant carries on arbitrage business…