CIT v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal
366 ITR 217High Court2014#1360 most cited
What is CIT v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal authority for?
An Assessing Officer cannot make an addition under section 68 without conducting further inquiries to disprove the assessee's explanation of the source of cash credits. The assessee is not required to prove the 'source of source'.
84
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal · section 68 · addition under section 68 · source of source · creditworthiness of the creditor · cash credits · unexplained money · assessment procedure · evidence · onus and natural justice · section 142(1) · section 250
Also reported as
224 Taxmann 87