CIT v. Ingersoll Rand International Ind. Ltd.
48 Taxmann.com 349High Court2014#3185 most cited
What is CIT v. Ingersoll Rand International Ind. Ltd. authority for?
A payment for non-compete fees creates a commercial right and is considered an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii).
38
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Ingersoll Rand International India Ltd. · Section 32(1)(ii) · non-compete fee · intangible asset · depreciation on non-compete fee · commercial right · CIT v Ingersoll Rand International Ltd. 227 Taxmann 176 · 48 Taxmann.com 349
Also reported as
227 Taxmann 176
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Ingersoll Rand International Ind. Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 38 · Page 1 of 2