CIT v. Hotel Joshi

242 ITR 478High Court2000#3214 most cited

What is CIT v. Hotel Joshi authority for?

The Assessing Officer can refer the matter to the Valuation Officer for determining the cost of construction. When estimating the cost of construction, the State PWD rates should be preferred over CPWD rates in Rajasthan. The item-wise detailed method of valuation is the most accurate and reliable.

37

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Hotel Joshi · section 55A · section 131 · section 133(6) · section 142(2) · cost of construction · Valuation Officer · State PWD rates · item-wise detailed method

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Hotel Joshi

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, KANPUR., KANPUR vs. M/S. SUSHRUT INSTITUTE OF PLASTIC SURGERY PRIVATE LIMITED, LUCKNOW

The appeal of the Department stands dismissed whereas the Cross Objection of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 30/LKW/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2019-20 The Acit V. M/S Sushrut Institute Of Plastic Central Circle 2 Surgery Private Limited Kanpur 29, Shahmeena Road Lucknow Tan/Pan:Aaics2582G (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.15/Lkw/2023 [Arising Out Of Ita No.30/Lkw/2023] Assessment Year: 2019-20 M/S Sushrut Institute Of Plastic V. The Acit Surgery Private Limited Central Circle 2 29, Shahmeena Road Kanpur Lucknow Tan/Pan:Aaics2582G (Cross - Objector) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Jaiswal AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R
Section 115BSection 133ASection 142ASection 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 271ASection 36(1)(va)Section 69Section 69A

…to the Valuation Officer for the purpose of Section 55 (A), 131, 133 (6) and 142 (2) and not for the purpose of finding out the cost. Next, we come to the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hotel Joshi, (2000) 242 ITR 478 (Raj). This was a case in respect of Assessment Years 1980-81 to 1985-86 before introduction of Section 142A. In the said case, the assessee had constructed a hotel building for which he had maintained regular books of account. All the amounts were vouched except some amount which was not supported by vouchers. During the course of the assessment…

Showing 120 of 37 · Page 1 of 2