SHRI KRISHNA S. CHAMANKAR ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT - 24(2), MUMBAI
Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed
ITA 7125/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2021AY 2015-16
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Amarjeet Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. No.7125/Mum/2019 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Shri Krishna S. Chamankar Acit – 24(2), R. No. 613, 6Th Floor, Piramal A-1001, Aditi C.H.S.L, Svp Nagar, बिाम/ Versova Telex, Andheri (West) Chambers, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai-400 053 Mumbai-400 012 Vs.
For Appellant: Shri Anil Sathe, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Gurbinder Singh, Ld. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)
…ng case laws in support of his contentions: • Supreme Court in case of CIT vs. Mohanakala (2007) 291 ITR 278/161 Taxman 169 • RoshanDi Haiti vs. CIT (1977) 107 ITR 938 (SC) • A. Govindarajulumudaliar vs. CIT (1958) 34 ITR 807 (SC) • Sikri& Co. P. Ltd. vs. CIT 106 ITR 682, 688 CIT vs. KulwantKaur 121 ITR 914, CIT vs. Sahibganj Electric Cables P. Ltd. 115 ITR 408, 414. 4.1.4 After carefully going through the submissions of the appellant as well as the views enumerated by me AO, I am of the considered opinion that the AO has erred in his judgement while passing the Assessment Order. The appellant has substantially…