CIT v. G.M. Mittal Stainless Steel (P.) Ltd.

130 Taxmann 67Supreme Court of India2003#5183 most cited

What is CIT v. G.M. Mittal Stainless Steel (P.) Ltd. authority for?

The assessment order, if it considered all referred cases during a CAS assessment, is not subject to revision under Section 263 if it is not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue.

22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. G.M. Mittal Stainless Steel · Section 263 · assessment order · CAS assessment · erroneous and prejudicial to revenue · referred cases · Bombay High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. G.M. Mittal Stainless Steel (P.) Ltd.

Kunjan Jagdishchandra Sedani, Jamangar vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamnagar

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 197/RJT/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Aug 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.197/Rjt/2025 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Kunjan Jagdishchandra Sedani Principal Commissioner Of Vs. 18B, Parikunj, Mahavir Society, Income Tax, Jamnagar Room No. 101, 1St Floor Aayakar Bedi Bunder Road, Jamnagar- 361008 Bhavan, Nr. Subhash Bridge, Jamnagar-361001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Erips2050H (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Dushyant Maharshi, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Praveen Verma, Ld. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 23/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 25/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am By Way Of This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged The Correctness Of The Order Dated 21.02.2025 Passed By The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax (In Short “Ld Pcit”), Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act'), For The Assessment Year 2015- 16.Grievances Raised By The Assessee, Which, Being Interconnected, Will Be Taken Up Together, Are As Follows: 1. Hon'Ble Pr. Cit, Jamnagar Has Erred In Law & In Facts In Setting-Aside The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 147 R W.S. 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 By Invoking The Provisions Of Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 Even When The Order As Passed By The Assessing Officer Was Neither Erroneous Nor Prejudicial To The Interests Of The Revenue. 2. Hon'Ble Pr. Cit, Jamnagar Erred In Law & In Facts By Setting-Aside The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 147 R.W.S. 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, Kunjan Jagdishchandra Sedani

For Appellant: Shri Dushyant Maharshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 147Section 263Section 68Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.197/RJT/2025 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Kunjan Jagdishchandra Sedani Principal Commissioner of Vs. 18B, Parikunj, Mahavir Society, Income Tax, Jamnagar Room no. 101, 1st floor Aayakar Bedi Bunder Road, Jamnagar- 361008 Bhavan, Nr. Subhash Bridge, Jamnagar-361001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ERIPS2050H (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Dushyant Maharshi, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Praveen Verma, Ld. C…

CIT v. G.M. Mittal Stainless Steel (P.) Ltd. (130 Taxmann 67) — Cited in 22 Judgments | BharatTax