CIT v. Express Newspapers Ltd.

53 ITR 250Supreme Court of India1964#7964 most cited
14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2024.

Judgments citing CIT v. Express Newspapers Ltd.

TRIMBAK HATCHERIES PVT. LTD.,,NASHIK vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 951/PUN/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Nov 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.951/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Trimbak Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd., Flat No.4 & 5, Anandkunj Apartment, Old Gangapur Naka, Gangapur Road, Nashik – 422005. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aabct0456H बनाम / V/S. Acit, Circle-1, ……""यथ" / Respondent Nashik. Assessee By : Shri Kishor Phadke Revenue By : Shri Pankaj Garg सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05.11.2019 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 06.11.2019 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Nashik Dated 13.02.2017 For The Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under :- “1. The Learned Cit(A)-1, Nasik & The Learned Ao Erred In Law & On Facts In Not Allowing Set-Off Of Brought Forward Business Loss Amounting To Rs. 1,98,42,328/- Against The Short Term Capital Gain Arising From Sale Of Building & Other Depreciable Assets, Which Were Used For Carrying Out Business Activities. 2. The Learned Cit(A)-1, Nasik & The Learned Ao Erred In Law & On Facts In Not Allowing Set-Off Of Brought Forward Business Loss Against The Long Term Capital Gain Arising From Sale Of Land, Which Was Distressed Sale. 3. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add / Modify / Alter / Delete All Or Any Of The Grounds Of Appeal.”

For Appellant: Shri Kishor PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 2Section 50B

…e of capital assets was not available to be set-off against the brought forward loss of earlier years. In coming to such conclusion, the Special Bench referred to the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Express Newspapers Ltd. (1964) 53 ITR 250 (SC) wherein it has been observed that the fact that capital gains are connected with the capital assets of the business cannot make them the profit of the business. Therefore, having regard to the aforesaid, it cannot be said that even after applying commercial principles the impugned receipts on account of sale of capital assets are in the natur…

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. NDC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 3011/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2004-05 Dcit, Vs. Ndc Telecommunications Circle-18(1), India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 4, Central Lane, Bengali Market, New Delhi. Pan: Aaacn2219C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Salil Kapoor & Ms Ananya Kapoor, Advocates Revenue By : Shri B.P. Singh, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.10.2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.10.2018 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 25Th February, 2015 Of The Cit(A)-6,Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2004-05. 2. The Only Effective Ground Raised By The Revenue Reads As Under:- “1. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld.Cit(A) Was Justified In Holding That Reassessment Cannot Be Made In The Case Of A Dissolved Company Even For The Year In Which The Company Was Existing.” 3. The Facts Of The Case In Brief Are That The Assessee Is A Company & Filed Its Return Of Income On 31St October, 2004 Declaring Loss Of Rs.11,08,72,956/-. The Assessing Officer Completed Assessment U/S 143(3) On 29Th September, 2006 Determining The Loss At Rs.8,78,79,819/-. Thereafter, Notice U/S 148 Dated 28Th March, 2011 Was Issued To The Assessee. The Assessee, In Response To The Statutory Notices, Appeared Before The Assessing Officer & Filed Various Details As Called For. The Assessing Officer Completed The Assessment Determining The Loss At Rs.7,27,32,900/-.

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor &For Respondent: Shri B.P. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…ing person. The assessment made long after a company was struck off from the register of the companies is not valid.” The aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Madras high Court has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CIT Vs. Express Newspapers Limited [53 ITR 250 (SC)]. 4.4 In Hewlett Packard India (P) Ltd Vs. ACIT (ITA No. 4016/Del/05) (ITAT Delhi) the Hon’ble Delhi Tribunal has held that no order can be passed on a non existing company. While passing the said order, the Hon’ble Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in the case of Impsat (P) Ltd Vs. ITO (91 ITD 354) (Del) wherein it was held that “ex…

CIT v. Express Newspapers Ltd. (53 ITR 250) — Cited in 14 Judgments | BharatTax