GODREJ INDUSTRIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 10(2), MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of Revenue is dismissed
ITA 1858/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jul 2019AY 2011-12
Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1823/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S. Godrej Industries Ltd., Income Tax-14(1)(2), Phirojshanagar, Eastern Mumbai Vs. Express Highway, Vikhroli (East), Mumbai .. (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) (P`%Yaqaai-/ Respondent) स्थायीलेखा िं./Pan No.Aacg2953R Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1858/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) Godrej Industries Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of C/O. Kalyaniwalla & Income Tax, Mistry Llp, Range-10(2), Vs. 2Nd Floor, Esplanade Now, The Asst. Commissioner House,29, Hazarimal Of Income Tax, Range-14(1)(2) Somani Marg,Fort,Mumbai Mumbai (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai-/ Respondent) अपीलाथीकीओर े/ Appellant By : Shri Rajendra Prasad, Dr प्रत्यथीकीओर े/ Respondent By : Shri F.V. Irani, Ar ुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 09.04.2019 घोषणाकीतारीख/ Date Of Pronouncement : 05.07.2019
For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Prasad, DRFor Respondent: Shri F.V. Irani, AR
Section 115Section 115JSection 14ASection 36(1)(iii)
…aced by cenvat in the valuation of closing stock.) Following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Indo Nippon Chemicals Co Ltd (supra), a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/s P a g e | 13 Diamond Dye Chem Ltd 396 ITR 536 dismissed the Revenue's Appeal making following observations: - “We have considered the submissions. It is not disputed that the assessee was liable to excise duty. The assessee got credit in the excise duty already paid on the raw materials purchased by it and utilized in the manufacturing of excisable goods. The assessee was adopting the exclu…