CIT v. Diamond Dye Chem Limited in ITA

396 ITR 536High Court#15837 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2021.

Judgments citing CIT v. Diamond Dye Chem Limited in ITA

GODREJ INDUSTRIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 10(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1858/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1823/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S. Godrej Industries Ltd., Income Tax-14(1)(2), Phirojshanagar, Eastern Mumbai Vs. Express Highway, Vikhroli (East), Mumbai .. (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) (P`%Yaqaai-/ Respondent) स्थायीलेखा िं./Pan No.Aacg2953R Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1858/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) Godrej Industries Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of C/O. Kalyaniwalla & Income Tax, Mistry Llp, Range-10(2), Vs. 2Nd Floor, Esplanade Now, The Asst. Commissioner House,29, Hazarimal Of Income Tax, Range-14(1)(2) Somani Marg,Fort,Mumbai Mumbai (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai-/ Respondent) अपीलाथीकीओर े/ Appellant By : Shri Rajendra Prasad, Dr प्रत्यथीकीओर े/ Respondent By : Shri F.V. Irani, Ar ुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 09.04.2019 घोषणाकीतारीख/ Date Of Pronouncement : 05.07.2019

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Prasad, DRFor Respondent: Shri F.V. Irani, AR
Section 115Section 115JSection 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

…aced by cenvat in the valuation of closing stock.) Following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Indo Nippon Chemicals Co Ltd (supra), a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/s P a g e | 13 Diamond Dye Chem Ltd 396 ITR 536 dismissed the Revenue's Appeal making following observations: - “We have considered the submissions. It is not disputed that the assessee was liable to excise duty. The assessee got credit in the excise duty already paid on the raw materials purchased by it and utilized in the manufacturing of excisable goods. The assessee was adopting the exclu…

DCIT 14(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. GODREJ INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1823/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1823/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S. Godrej Industries Ltd., Income Tax-14(1)(2), Phirojshanagar, Eastern Mumbai Vs. Express Highway, Vikhroli (East), Mumbai .. (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) (P`%Yaqaai-/ Respondent) स्थायीलेखा िं./Pan No.Aacg2953R Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1858/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) Godrej Industries Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of C/O. Kalyaniwalla & Income Tax, Mistry Llp, Range-10(2), Vs. 2Nd Floor, Esplanade Now, The Asst. Commissioner House,29, Hazarimal Of Income Tax, Range-14(1)(2) Somani Marg,Fort,Mumbai Mumbai (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai-/ Respondent) अपीलाथीकीओर े/ Appellant By : Shri Rajendra Prasad, Dr प्रत्यथीकीओर े/ Respondent By : Shri F.V. Irani, Ar ुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 09.04.2019 घोषणाकीतारीख/ Date Of Pronouncement : 05.07.2019

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Prasad, DRFor Respondent: Shri F.V. Irani, AR
Section 115Section 115JSection 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

…aced by cenvat in the valuation of closing stock.) Following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Indo Nippon Chemicals Co Ltd (supra), a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/s P a g e | 13 Diamond Dye Chem Ltd 396 ITR 536 dismissed the Revenue's Appeal making following observations: - “We have considered the submissions. It is not disputed that the assessee was liable to excise duty. The assessee got credit in the excise duty already paid on the raw materials purchased by it and utilized in the manufacturing of excisable goods. The assessee was adopting the exclu…

KANSAI NEROLAC PAINTS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT RG 6(2), MUMBAI

ITA 7196/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.6789/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ Dcit Circle -6(2) M/S. Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd., R.No. 563, Aayakar Bhavan, Nerolac House, K.G. Marg, M.K. Road, Churchgate, V. Lower Parel, Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400013 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aaacg1376N (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.7196/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ M/S. Kansai Nerolac Paints Addl. Cit Circle -6(2) Ltd., R.No. 669, Nerolac House, K.G. Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, V. Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aaacg1376N (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Ms. Aarti VissanjiFor Respondent: Shri. Rignesh K. Das (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 145ASection 14A

…essee is contending that it is following exclusive method of accounting while accounting for cenvat credits. Our attention was drawn to the decision of Hon‟ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Diamond Dye Chem Limited in ITA no. 146 of 2015 reported in 396 ITR 536(Bom.) . 20. The Ld. DR on the other hand relied upon the appellate order of the Ld. CIT(A). 22. We have considered rival contentions and perused the material on record. We have observed that the assessee is following exclusive method of accounting for valuing closing stock wherein unutilised MODVAT/Cenvat Credit is not added to the value of clo…

DCIT 6(2), MUMBAI vs. KANSAI NEROLAC PAINTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 6789/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.6789/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ Dcit Circle -6(2) M/S. Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd., R.No. 563, Aayakar Bhavan, Nerolac House, K.G. Marg, M.K. Road, Churchgate, V. Lower Parel, Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400013 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aaacg1376N (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.7196/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ M/S. Kansai Nerolac Paints Addl. Cit Circle -6(2) Ltd., R.No. 669, Nerolac House, K.G. Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, V. Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aaacg1376N (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Ms. Aarti VissanjiFor Respondent: Shri. Rignesh K. Das (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 145ASection 14A

…essee is contending that it is following exclusive method of accounting while accounting for cenvat credits. Our attention was drawn to the decision of Hon‟ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Diamond Dye Chem Limited in ITA no. 146 of 2015 reported in 396 ITR 536(Bom.) . 20. The Ld. DR on the other hand relied upon the appellate order of the Ld. CIT(A). 22. We have considered rival contentions and perused the material on record. We have observed that the assessee is following exclusive method of accounting for valuing closing stock wherein unutilised MODVAT/Cenvat Credit is not added to the value of clo…

CIT v. Diamond Dye Chem Limited in ITA (396 ITR 536) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax