CIT v. Cooper Engg. Ltd.

239 ITR 879Reported decision1999#20118 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Judgments citing CIT v. Cooper Engg. Ltd.

DDIT (IT)- 4 (1), MUMBAI vs. LUBRIZOL CORPORATION USA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA N0

ITA 1247/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1247/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10) The Deputy Director Of M/S Lubrizol Corporation बनाम/ Income Tax (International Usa, V. Taxation) – 4(1),Room No. C/O Ford, Rhodes, Parks 133 & Co., Scindia House,1 St Floor, Sai Commercial Building, Ballard Estate, 312/313, 3 Rd Floor, Mumbai – 400038. Bks Devshi Marg, Govandi (E), Mumbai – 400088. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aaact 2758F .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Aliasger Rampurawala
Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 234BSection 92C

…ge of the agent by the principal; and v) number of principals rerpresented by the agent. 10. The learned counsel of the assessee has submitted that the agency activity should be within the agent's ordinary business. The AAR in the case of AI Nisr Publishing, 239 ITR 879 examined the charter documents to determine whether the agency activities formed part of the agent's overall business activities. The activity should be similar or usual for the industry to which the agent belongs. It is submitted that the agents who have the authority to bind the principal vis-a-vis customers on the following conditions:- i) It…

CIT v. Cooper Engg. Ltd. (239 ITR 879) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax