CIT v. Consulting Engineering Services (India) Limited

250 ITR 849High Court2001#17465 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2020.

Judgments citing CIT v. Consulting Engineering Services (India) Limited

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ASHIANA HOUSING LIMITED , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 714/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm] I.T.A. No. 714/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Circle – 8(1)Kolkata.................................…………………………………………………Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, 5Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata – 700 069. [Pan: Aadca 9093 P] M/S. Ashiana Housing Limited...................………………………………………………….Respondent 11G, Everest, 46C, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata – 700 071. Appearances By: Shri Shankar Halder, Jcit, Sr. Dr Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri Arvind Agarwal, Advocate & Shri Rajat Agarwal, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 08, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 06, 2019 Order Per P.M. Jagtapthis Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) – 3, Kolkata Dated 23.02.2018 & The Solitary Issue Involved Therein Is Raised By The Revenue By Way Of The Following Ground: “That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Allowing The Future Development Expenses Amounting To Rs. 2,25,01,129/- By Ignoring The Fact That The Said Expenses Was Provision For Unascertained Liability.”

Section 143(3)Section 145

…wing the same method of accounting for a number of years. 4 M/s. Ashiana Housing Limited I.T.A. No.714/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 The A/R of the appellant placed reliance on the decision in the case of Consulting Engineering Services (India) Limited, 250 ITR 849 (Delhi) for the proposition that “Where a system of accounting (which includes allocation of indirect expenses) is consistently adopted and followed, the same cannot be altered in subsequent years”. On going through the submissions of the assessee it has been stated that this method of accounting regularly followed by the assessee has always been…

ACIT 11(1), MUMBAI vs. SATISH B KAUSHIK, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA N0

ITA 5601/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Feb 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 4832/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) Mr. Satish B. Kaushik, बनाम/ The Asst. Commissioner Of 803-04, A Wing, Income Tax – 11(1), V. Raj Classique Chs Ltd Yari Aayakar Bhavan, Road, Mumbai. Versova, Andheri (West), Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aampk1640E .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri Rakesh Ranjan (D.R.)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “E” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 4832/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) Mr. Satish B. Kaushik, बनाम/ The Asst. Commissioner of 803-04, A Wing, Income Tax – 11(1), v. Raj Classique CHS Ltd Yari Aayakar Bhavan, Road, Mumbai. Versova, Andheri (West), Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAMPK1640E .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 5601/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) The Asst. Commissioner of बनाम/ Mr. Satish B. Kaushik, Income Tax – 1…

SATISH B. KAUSHIK,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 11(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA N0

ITA 4832/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Feb 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 4832/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) Mr. Satish B. Kaushik, बनाम/ The Asst. Commissioner Of 803-04, A Wing, Income Tax – 11(1), V. Raj Classique Chs Ltd Yari Aayakar Bhavan, Road, Mumbai. Versova, Andheri (West), Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aampk1640E .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri Rakesh Ranjan (D.R.)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “E” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 4832/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) Mr. Satish B. Kaushik, बनाम/ The Asst. Commissioner of 803-04, A Wing, Income Tax – 11(1), v. Raj Classique CHS Ltd Yari Aayakar Bhavan, Road, Mumbai. Versova, Andheri (West), Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAMPK1640E .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 5601/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) The Asst. Commissioner of बनाम/ Mr. Satish B. Kaushik, Income Tax – 1…

CIT v. Consulting Engineering Services (India) Limited (250 ITR 849) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax