CIT v. Chika Overseas (P.) Ltd.

209 Taxmann 456Reported decision2012#6780 most cited
17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Chika Overseas (P.) Ltd.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1)(5), SURAT vs. SHRI SAGARBHAI BIJALBHAI RABARI, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 97/SRT/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.97/Srt/2017 (Ay 2013-14) & आ.अ.सं./Ita No.183/Srt/2020 (Ay 2013-14) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Income Tax Officer, Ward- 3(1)(5), Surat, Room No.115, 1St Floor, Anavil Business Cntre, Hajira Road, Opp. Star Bazar, Adajan, Surat-395007 Shri Sagarbhai Bijaibhai Rabari, 33-34, Ambika Income Tax Officer, Ward- Nagar, Luhar Falia, Nana Vs 3[2][10], Surat, Room No.115, Varachha, Surat-395006 1St Floor, Anavil Business Pan No. Adapr 4150 K Cntre, Hajira Road, Opp. Star Bazar, Adajan, Surat-395007 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 250(4)Section 254(1)

…of property. The Department is in appeal before Tribunal. The Assessing Officer is not empowered to reopen the case under section 147 in view of decision in the case of Chika Overseas Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (2011) 131 ITD 471 (Mum- Trib); ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. DCIT 246 CTR 292 (Bom) and CIT Vs Flothern Engineering Pvt Ltd 225 Taxman 223 (Mad.) The assessee also furnished detailed written submission. 17. On merit of the addition, the assessee again vide his written submission dated 24.02.2022 and submitted that reasons of reopening is based on the order of Ld. CIT(A) on same issue. The assessee furnished original assess…

DCIT CEN CIR 10, MUMBAI vs. AJMERA HOUSING CORPORATION, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1201/MUM/2013[1990-91]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2018AY 1990-91

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu & Shri Pawan Singhacit Central Circle-10, M/S Ajmera Housing Corporation Room No. 802, 8Th Floor, “Citi Mall”, Link Road, Vs. Old Cgo Annexe Bldg., M.K. Andheri (W), Mumbai-53. Road, Mumbai-400020. Pan: Aaafa3654J (Appellant) ( Respondent) Revenue By : Shri R.P. Meena (Dr) Assessee By : Shri Prakash K. Jotwani (Ar) Date Of Hearing : 23.04.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.04.2018 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act Per Pawan Singh: 1. This Appeal By Revenue Under Section 253 Of Income Tax Act Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner (Appeals)-37, Mumbai Dated 14Th

For Appellant: Shri Prakash K. Jotwani (AR)For Respondent: Shri R.P. Meena (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 220(2)Section 245DSection 245D(4)Section 253Section 254(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENCH “A” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ACIT Central Circle-10, M/s Ajmera Housing Corporation Room No. 802, 8th Floor, “Citi Mall”, Link Road, Vs. Old CGO Annexe Bldg., M.K. Andheri (W), Mumbai-53. Road, Mumbai-400020. PAN: AAAFA3654J (Appellant) ( Respondent) Revenue by : Shri R.P. Meena (DR) Assessee by : Shri Prakash K. Jotwani (AR) Date of hearing : 23.04.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 27.04.2018 Order Under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by Revenue under secti…

DCIT CEN CIR 10, MUMBAI vs. VIJAY NAGAR CORPORATION, MUMBAI

Accordingly both the appeals filed by the revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 1177/MUM/2013[1992-93]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 1992-93

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1176/Mum/2013 & 1177/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 1991-92 & 1992-93) Dy. Commissioner Of Income M/S. Vijay Nagar बनाम/ Tax Central Circle 10 Corporation Vs. Room No.802, 8Th Floor, “Citi Mall” Link Road, Old Cgo Annexe Bldg., Andheri (West) M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400053 Mumbai - 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaafv5936C

For Appellant: Shri Prakash JotwaniFor Respondent: Shri Vikram Batra
Section 154Section 220(2)Section 245D(1)Section 245D(4)Section 254D(4)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,“एफ” "यायपीठ, मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI "ी आर. सी. शमा", लेखा सद"य, एवं "ी अमरजीत "संह, "या"यक सद"य, के सम" BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1176/Mum/2013 & 1177/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 1991-92 & 1992-93) Dy. Commissioner of Income M/s. Vijay Nagar बनाम/ Tax Central Circle 10 Corporation Vs. Room No.802, 8th Floor, “Citi Mall” Link Road, Old CGO Annexe Bldg., Andheri (West) M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400053 Mumbai - 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAFV5936C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" /…

DCIT CEN CIR 10, MUMBAI vs. VIJAY NAGAR CORPORATION, MUMBAI

Accordingly both the appeals filed by the revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 1176/MUM/2013[1991-92]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 1991-92

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1176/Mum/2013 & 1177/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 1991-92 & 1992-93) Dy. Commissioner Of Income M/S. Vijay Nagar बनाम/ Tax Central Circle 10 Corporation Vs. Room No.802, 8Th Floor, “Citi Mall” Link Road, Old Cgo Annexe Bldg., Andheri (West) M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400053 Mumbai - 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaafv5936C

For Appellant: Shri Prakash JotwaniFor Respondent: Shri Vikram Batra
Section 154Section 220(2)Section 245D(1)Section 245D(4)Section 254D(4)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,“एफ” "यायपीठ, मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI "ी आर. सी. शमा", लेखा सद"य, एवं "ी अमरजीत "संह, "या"यक सद"य, के सम" BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1176/Mum/2013 & 1177/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 1991-92 & 1992-93) Dy. Commissioner of Income M/s. Vijay Nagar बनाम/ Tax Central Circle 10 Corporation Vs. Room No.802, 8th Floor, “Citi Mall” Link Road, Old CGO Annexe Bldg., Andheri (West) M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400053 Mumbai - 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAFV5936C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" /…

CIT v. Chika Overseas (P.) Ltd. (209 Taxmann 456) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax