CIT v. Chandrasekaran

66 Taxmann.com 334High Court2016#10100 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2022.

Also reported as

230 Taxmann 658

Judgments citing CIT v. Chandrasekaran

SHRI. MALLIKARJUN H. METI,BAGALKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1, BAGALKOT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1562/BANG/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Oct 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. N. V. Vasudevan & Shri. A. K. Garodiaassessment Year : 2009 – 10 Shri. Mallikarjun H. Meti, The Income Tax Officer, Contractor, Extension Area, Ward-1, ‘Aayakar Bhavan’, Bagalkot. Vs. Sector No.24, Navanagar, Pan : Abbpm 5104 F Bagalkot – 587 103. Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Siva Prasad Reddy, Irs Revenue By : Shri. Manjeet Singh, Addl. Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 14.10.2020 Date Of Pronouncement : 16.10.2020 O R D E R Per Arun Kumar Garodia, A. M.: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee & The Same Is Directed Against The Order Of Cit(A), Bagalkot, Dated 30.03.2019 For Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessee Has Raised Four Grounds But There Is Only One Grievance About Penalty Imposed By The Ao U/S 271 (1) (C).

For Appellant: Shri. Siva Prasad Reddy, IRSFor Respondent: Shri. Manjeet Singh, Addl. CIT DR
Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2009 – 10 Shri. Mallikarjun H. Meti, The Income Tax Officer, Contractor, Extension Area, Ward-1, ‘Aayakar Bhavan’, Bagalkot. Vs. Sector No.24, Navanagar, PAN : ABBPM 5104 F Bagalkot – 587 103. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Siva Prasad Reddy, IRS Revenue by : Shri. Manjeet Singh, Addl. CIT DR Date of hearing : 14.10.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 16.10.2020 O R D E R PER ARUN KUMAR GARODIA, A. M.: This appeal is filed by the assessee and the s…