CIT v. B.G. Shirke Construction Technology P. Ltd.

395 ITR 371High Court2017#1365 most cited

What is CIT v. B.G. Shirke Construction Technology P. Ltd. authority for?

An assessee can lodge a new claim in proceedings under Section 153A for abated assessment years, even if it was not claimed in the original return of income, provided the assessment abated as a consequence of a search.

84

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. B.G. Shirke Construction Technology P. Ltd. · Section 153A · new claim in search assessment · abated assessment years · claim not in original return · assessee new claim · determination of correct tax liability · Bombay High Court 153A

Also reported as

79 Taxmann.com 306246 Taxmann 300

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. B.G. Shirke Construction Technology P. Ltd.

VSN AND JEEVAN INFRA DEVELOPERS, PERURU PANCHAYAT,TIRUPATHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 707/HYD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.707/Hyd/2017 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10) Vsn & Jeevan Infra Vs. Dy.Cit Developers, Peruru Central Circle Panchayat, Tirupati Tirupati Pan:Aaifv3414B (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocate H Srinivasulu राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/11/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 19/11/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By Vsn & Jeevan Infra Developers (“The Assessee”), Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Visakhapatnam (“Ld. Cit(A)”) Dated 21.02.2017 For The A.Y 2009- 10. Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Advocate H SrinivasuluFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153Section 153CSection 68

…ITA No 707 of 2017 VSN and Jeevan Infra Developers आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ DB-B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad "ी "वजय पाल राव, उपा" य" एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, लेखा सद" य के सम" । Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.707/Hyd/2017 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10) VSN and Jeevan Infra Vs. Dy.CIT Developers, Peruru Central Circle Panchayat, Tirupati Tirupati PAN:AAIFV3414B (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee by: Advocate H Srinivasulu राज" व "ारा/Revenue by:: Dr. Sachin Kumar,…

M/S. PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands\ndismissed

ITA 321/MUM/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain&\Nshri Prabhash Shankar\N\Ni.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\N\Npatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs\Nknown As Ruchi Soya\Nindustries Ltd)\N616, Tulsiani Chambers,\Nnariman Point, Mumbai\Npan - Aaacr2892L\Ndy. Cit, Cc – 7(2)\N655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar\Nbhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai\N400020.\N(Appellant)\N(Respondent)\N\Ni.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\Ndy. Cit, Cc – 7(2)\N655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar\Nbhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai\N400020.\N(Appellant)\Nvs\Npatanjali\Nfood\Nltd\N(Formerly Known As Ruchi\Nsoya Industries Ltd)\N616, Tulsiani Chambers,\Nnariman Point, Mumbai\Npan – Aaacr2892L\N(Respondent)\N\Nassessee By\Nrevenue By\Ndate Of Hearing\Ndate Of Pronouncement\N\Nshri Ss Nagar (Virtually Appeared) &\Nshri B Maheshwari\Nshri Ra Dhyani, Cit Dr\N11.08.2025\N15.09.2025\N\Norder\N\Nper: Shri. Sandeep Gosain, J.M.:\Nthe Present Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee\Nchallenging The Different Impugned Orders Passed Under\Nsection 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act'), By The\Nnational Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) / Cit(A) For The\N Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2011-12.\N\N2. Since All The Issues Involved In These Two Appeals Are\Ncommon & Identical, Therefore, They Have Been Clubbed,\Nheard Together & Consolidated Order Is Being Passed For\Nthe Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.\N\Nita No. 319/Mum/2023, A.Y 2007-08\N\N3. At The Time Of Hearing Ld.Ar Stated At Bar That Assessee\Nwants To Withdraw The Present Appeal. Therefore, Considering\Nthe Statement Of The Ld.Ar, The Present Appeal Filed By The\Nassessee Stands Dismissed As Withdrawn.\N\N3.

Section 132Section 153ASection 250Section 37(1)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER &\nSHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\n\nI.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\n\nPatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs\nKnown as Ruchi Soya\nIndustries Ltd)\n616, Tulsiani Chambers,\nNariman Point, Mumbai\nPAN - AAACR2892L\nDy. CIT, CC – 7(2)\n655, 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, MK Road, Mumbai\n400020.\n(Appellant)\n(Respondent)\n\nI.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\nDy. CIT, CC – 7(2)\n655, 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, MK Road, Mumbai\n400020.\n(Appellant)\nVs\…

PATANJALI FOODS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD),MUMBAI vs. DY COMM OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands\ndismissed

ITA 319/MUM/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Sept 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain&\Nshri Prabhash Shankar\N\Ni.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\Npatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs Dy. Cit, Cc – 7(2)\Nknown As Ruchi Soya 655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar\Nindustries Ltd) Bhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai\N616, Tulsiani Chambers, 400020.\Nnariman Point, Mumbai\Npan - Aaacr2892L\N(Respondent)\N(Appellant)\N\Ni.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\Na.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\Ndy. Cit, Cc – 7(2) Vs Patanjali Food Ltd\N655, 6Th Floor, Aayakar (Formerly Known As Ruchi\Nbhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai Soya Industries Ltd)\N400020.\N616, Tulsiani Chambers,\N(Appellant) Nariman Point, Mumbai\Npan – Aaacr2892L\N(Respondent)\N\Nassessee By Shri Ss Nagar (Virtually Appeared) &\Nshri B Maheshwari\Nrevenue By Shri Ra Dhyani, Cit Dr\Ndate Of Hearing 11.08.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement 15.09.2025\N\Norder\N\Nper: Shri. Sandeep Gosain, J.M.:\N\Nthe Present Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee\Nchallenging The Different Impugned Orders Passed Under\Nsection 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act'), By The\Nnational Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) / Cit(A) For The\N Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2011-12.\N\N2. Since All The Issues Involved In These Two Appeals Are\Ncommon & Identical, Therefore, They Have Been Clubbed,\Nheard Together & Consolidated Order Is Being Passed For\N\Nthe Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.\N\Nita No. 319/Mum/2023, A.Y 2007-08\N\N3. At The Time Of Hearing Ld.Ar Stated At Bar That Assessee\Nwants To Withdraw The Present Appeal. Therefore, Considering\Nthe Statement Of The Ld.Ar, The Present Appeal Filed By The\Nassessee Stands Dismissed As Withdrawn.\N\N3.

Section 132Section 153ASection 250Section 37(1)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI\n\nBEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER &\nSHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\n\nI.T.A. No. 319& 321/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08 & 2011-12\nPatanjali Food Ltd (Formerly Vs Dy. CIT, CC – 7(2)\nKnown as Ruchi Soya 655, 6th Floor, Aayakar\nIndustries Ltd) Bhavan, MK Road, Mumbai\n616, Tulsiani Chambers, 400020.\nNariman Point, Mumbai\nPAN - AAACR2892L\n(Respondent)\n(Appellant)\n\nI.T.A. No. 1173 & 1174/Mum/2023\nA.Ys: 2007-08, 2011-12\nDy. CIT, CC – 7(2) Vs Patanjali Food Ltd\n655, 6th Floor, Aayakar (Formerly Known as Ruchi\nBhavan,…

Showing 120 of 84 · Page 1 of 5

CIT v. B.G. Shirke Construction Technology P. Ltd. (395 ITR 371) — Cited in 84 Judgments | BharatTax