CIT v. Areva T & D India Ltd.

129 Taxmann.com 55High Court2021#8186 most cited
13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)Section 37(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(42C)Section 28(va)

Issues it is cited on

depreciation on non-compete feenon-compete feesection 32(1)(ii)mat creditsection 32(1)enduring benefitsection 36(1)(iii)section 32section 36(1)(va)capital expenditurerevenue expendituresection 14a

Judgments citing CIT v. Areva T & D India Ltd.

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS "JRG SECURITIES LTD"),KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 243/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 242/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 241/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 240/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 239/COCH/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

WNS GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMM. OF INCOME TAX -14(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2451/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Vikas Awasthy () & Ms. Padmavathy S. ()

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234CSection 43BSection 92C

…1 ITA 2450 & 2451/Mum/2022 WNS Global Services Pvt Ltd THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “J”, MUMBAI BEFORE VIKAS AWASTHY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S. (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.2450 & 2451/Mum/2022 (Assessment year 2018-2019 & 2017-18) WNS GLOBAL SERVICES vs Assistant Commissioner of Income- PRIVATE LIMITED tax-14(1)(2), Mumbai 4th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan PL.10/11, GATE NO.4, GODREJ BOYCE COMPLEX, M.K. Road, Mumbai FIRSHANAGAR, L.B.S. MARG VIKHROLI (WEST), MUMBAI PAN : AAACW2598L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by Mr. Porus Kaka, Manish Kanth Department represented by Smt.So…

WNS GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMM. OF INCOME TAX-14(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2450/MUM/2022[208-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jul 2023

Bench: Vikas Awasthy () & Ms. Padmavathy S. ()

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234CSection 43BSection 92C

…1 ITA 2450 & 2451/Mum/2022 WNS Global Services Pvt Ltd THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “J”, MUMBAI BEFORE VIKAS AWASTHY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S. (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.2450 & 2451/Mum/2022 (Assessment year 2018-2019 & 2017-18) WNS GLOBAL SERVICES vs Assistant Commissioner of Income- PRIVATE LIMITED tax-14(1)(2), Mumbai 4th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan PL.10/11, GATE NO.4, GODREJ BOYCE COMPLEX, M.K. Road, Mumbai FIRSHANAGAR, L.B.S. MARG VIKHROLI (WEST), MUMBAI PAN : AAACW2598L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by Mr. Porus Kaka, Manish Kanth Department represented by Smt.So…

HARITA FEHRER LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CC - 2 (2),, CHENNAI

Appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 2746/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2254/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3480/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3481/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2746/Chny/2019 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S. Harita Fehrer Limited Dcit-Corporate Circle-2(2) / बनाम/ No.29, Jayalakshmi Estates, Acit, Salary Circle-Ii Vs. Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006. Chennai. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aacch-1037-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : ( !थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (Fca), Shri Ravikumar, (Ca) & Shri Anil Kumar, (Ca) - Ld. Ars !थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan (Add.Cit)-Ld. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (FCA)For Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan (Add.CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(vii)

…le assets that form part of the tool of trade of an assessee facilitating smooth carrying on of the business. 10. This decision has subsequently been followed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of the same assessee for AY 2006-07 which is reported as 129 Taxmann.com 55. In this decision, Hon’ble Court has distinguished the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Sharp Business System vs. CIT (27 Taxmann.com 50) as under: - 11. The second question is as to whether the non compete fee is an asset in the nature of patents, copyrights, trademark, licence, franchises or any other business or commercial right…

HARITA FAHRER LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORP CIR-2(2), CHENNAI

Appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 3481/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2254/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3480/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3481/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2746/Chny/2019 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S. Harita Fehrer Limited Dcit-Corporate Circle-2(2) / बनाम/ No.29, Jayalakshmi Estates, Acit, Salary Circle-Ii Vs. Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006. Chennai. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aacch-1037-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : ( !थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (Fca), Shri Ravikumar, (Ca) & Shri Anil Kumar, (Ca) - Ld. Ars !थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan (Add.Cit)-Ld. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (FCA)For Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan (Add.CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(vii)

…le assets that form part of the tool of trade of an assessee facilitating smooth carrying on of the business. 10. This decision has subsequently been followed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of the same assessee for AY 2006-07 which is reported as 129 Taxmann.com 55. In this decision, Hon’ble Court has distinguished the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Sharp Business System vs. CIT (27 Taxmann.com 50) as under: - 11. The second question is as to whether the non compete fee is an asset in the nature of patents, copyrights, trademark, licence, franchises or any other business or commercial right…

HARITA FAHRER LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORP CIR-2(2), CHENNAI

Appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 3480/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2254/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3480/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3481/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2746/Chny/2019 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S. Harita Fehrer Limited Dcit-Corporate Circle-2(2) / बनाम/ No.29, Jayalakshmi Estates, Acit, Salary Circle-Ii Vs. Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006. Chennai. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aacch-1037-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : ( !थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (Fca), Shri Ravikumar, (Ca) & Shri Anil Kumar, (Ca) - Ld. Ars !थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan (Add.Cit)-Ld. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (FCA)For Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan (Add.CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(vii)

…le assets that form part of the tool of trade of an assessee facilitating smooth carrying on of the business. 10. This decision has subsequently been followed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of the same assessee for AY 2006-07 which is reported as 129 Taxmann.com 55. In this decision, Hon’ble Court has distinguished the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Sharp Business System vs. CIT (27 Taxmann.com 50) as under: - 11. The second question is as to whether the non compete fee is an asset in the nature of patents, copyrights, trademark, licence, franchises or any other business or commercial right…

HARITA FEHRER LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT SALARY CIRCLE II , CHENNAI

Appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 2254/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2254/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3480/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.3481/Chny/2018 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2746/Chny/2019 (िनधाBरण वषB / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S. Harita Fehrer Limited Dcit-Corporate Circle-2(2) / बनाम/ No.29, Jayalakshmi Estates, Acit, Salary Circle-Ii Vs. Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006. Chennai. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aacch-1037-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : ( !थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (Fca), Shri Ravikumar, (Ca) & Shri Anil Kumar, (Ca) - Ld. Ars !थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan (Add.Cit)-Ld. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Dinodia, (FCA)For Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan (Add.CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(vii)

…le assets that form part of the tool of trade of an assessee facilitating smooth carrying on of the business. 10. This decision has subsequently been followed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of the same assessee for AY 2006-07 which is reported as 129 Taxmann.com 55. In this decision, Hon’ble Court has distinguished the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Sharp Business System vs. CIT (27 Taxmann.com 50) as under: - 11. The second question is as to whether the non compete fee is an asset in the nature of patents, copyrights, trademark, licence, franchises or any other business or commercial right…

M/S ARKEMA PEROXIDES INDIA LTD.,CHENNAI vs. THE ASSTT. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CORPORATE CIRCLE1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 897/CHNY/2020[2016-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2016-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Mr. R.Vijayaraghavan, Advocate
Section 32(1)(ii)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी ’ "याय पीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी. दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी. मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम$ BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 897/Chny/ 2020 ("नधा"रणवष" /Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/s.Arkema Peroxides India Pvt.Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner of 1st floor, Balmer Laurie House, Income Tax 628, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Corporate Circle-1(1) Chennai-18. Chennai. PAN: AAACE 1713F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. R.Vijayaraghavan,…

DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the ground No

ITA 349/HYD/2017[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Jul 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri K.Narasimha Charyassessment Years: 2001-02 Dr.Reddy’S Laboratories Vs. Dcit,Circle-1(2) Limited Hyderabad 8-2-337, Road No.3 Banjara Hills Hyderabad-500 034

For Appellant: Shri P.S.R.V.V.Surya Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai,CIT-DR
Section 28Section 32Section 32(1)(ii)Section 32(2)Section 37Section 80H

…1 Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Limited IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member AND Shri K.Narasimha Chary, Judicial Member Assessment Years: 2001-02 Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Vs. DCIT,Circle-1(2) Limited Hyderabad 8-2-337, Road No.3 Banjara Hills Hyderabad-500 034 PAN : AAACD7999Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri P.S.R.V.V.Surya Rao, CA Revenue by: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai,CIT-DR Date of hearing: 05.07.2022 Date of pronouncement: 08. 07.2022 O R D E R Per Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, A.M.: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed agai…

CIT v. Areva T & D India Ltd. (129 Taxmann.com 55) — Cited in 13 Judgments | BharatTax