CIT-I v. Maheshchandra G. Vakil
40 Taxmann.com 326High Court2013#1634 most cited
What is CIT-I v. Maheshchandra G. Vakil authority for?
An Assessing Officer is not justified in treating capital gain from the sale of shares as unexplained cash credit when the assessee proves the genuineness of share transactions with contract notes, broker's bank statements, DMAT accounts, and stock exchange abstracts.
69
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Maheshchandra G. Vakil · Section 68 · Section 10(38) · genuineness of share transactions · long term capital gain · bogus LTCG · unexplained cash credit · DMAT accounts · contract notes
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT-I v. Maheshchandra G. Vakil
Showing 1–20 of 69 · Page 1 of 4