CIT (central), Kochi v. Damac

89 Taxmann.com 70High Court2018#3818 most cited

What is CIT (central), Kochi v. Damac authority for?

During a search, the presumption of correctness under section 132(4A) regarding entries in seized books and documents applies equally to the assessee, acting as a double-edged sword for both parties. The revenue must rebut this presumption to disregard the entries.

31

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Damac Holdings · section 132(4A) · search and seizure · presumption of correctness · assessee's right · revenue's onus · books of account · double-edged sword

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT (central), Kochi v. Damac

CIT (central), Kochi v. Damac (89 Taxmann.com 70) — Cited in 31 Judgments | BharatTax