CIT, Ajmer v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal, Rajasthan HC, 06-02

169 Taxmann.com 18Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2024#8237 most cited

What is CIT, Ajmer v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal, Rajasthan HC, 06-02 authority for?

The Assessing Officer's power to make additions under Section 68 is not restricted by the repayment of loans or advances, especially when the source of such funds remains unexplained. The Tribunal's power to admit additional evidence under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules is discretionary and subject to reasonable grounds.

13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT · Ajmer v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal · Section 68 · Section 143(3) · Section 142(1) · Section 147 · Section 148 · Section 250 · Section 115BBE · Section 132 · shell company · source of source · section 246 · section 250(4) · section 41 · addition under section 68 · admission of additional evidence · principal commissioner of income-tax · documents seized · share application money · rule 46a · tangible material

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT, Ajmer v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal, Rajasthan HC, 06-02

CIT, Ajmer v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal, Rajasthan HC, 06-02 (169 Taxmann.com 18) — Cited in 13 Judgments | BharatTax