CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities

282 CTR 321High Court2016#1945 most cited

What is CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities authority for?

For assuming jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the seized documents must be incriminating in nature and directly relate to each specific assessment year for which assessments are sought to be reopened. The satisfaction note forms the indispensable basis for initiating these proceedings.

59

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities · Section 153C jurisdiction · incriminating documents · related assessment years · satisfaction note · search assessment · reopened assessment · 153C proceedings · Delhi High Court

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153ASection 147Section 148Section 151Section 149Section 139

Issues it is cited on

section 153atosection 153b(1)(a)abatement of assessmentsection 153c proceedingssection 113section 153b(1)section 158bdsection 153c(1)section 132(5)section 100panchnamasection 153(c)(1)

Judgments citing CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4304/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4303/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4302/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4301/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4300/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4299/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4298/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

PRATISHTHA IMAGES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4297/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4280/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4279/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4278/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4277/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4276/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4275/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4274/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALANKIT FINSEC LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, DELHI

ITA 4273/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALKA AGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI

ITA 4272/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALKA AGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI

ITA 4271/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALKA AGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI

ITA 4269/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

ALKA AGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI

ITA 4268/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…f the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (supra) settles the issue and holds this to be an essential requirement. The decisions of this Court in CIT-7 v. RRJ Securities [2015] 62 taxmann.com 391/[2016] 282 CTR 321/380 ITR 612 (Delhi) and ARN Infrastructure India Limited v. ACIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 260/394 ITR 569 (Delhi) also hold that in order to justify the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act the documents seized must be incriminating and must relate to each of the AYs whose assessments are sought to be reopened. Since the satisfac…

Showing 1–20 of 59 · Page 1 of 3