Chryscapital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

376 ITR 183High Court2015#569 most cited

What is Chryscapital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

For transfer pricing comparability analysis, companies should not be excluded solely based on higher turnover if they are otherwise functionally comparable, unless the turnover difference reflects fundamental functional dissimilarities, brand value, or risk profiles that materially impact profitability.

170

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Chryscapital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT · turnover filter validity · transfer pricing comparable companies · functional comparability criteria · Section 92CA(3) application · Section 92C(3) analysis · exclusion of comparables for high turnover · arm's length price determination · giant company in comparables · Infosys Technologies Ltd. exclusion.

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 92CA(3)Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 144CSection 144C(13)Section 92C(3)Section 92CA

Issues it is cited on

multiple year datatested partysection 92fsection 92c(3)far analysistransactional net margin methodcomparable companiesworking capital adjustmentarms length pricespecified domestic transactionmost appropriate methodarm's length price

Judgments citing Chryscapital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. NUTRICRAFT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, BENGALURU

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 298/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Muthu Shankar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), BengaluruFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CA
Section 143(3)Section 148ASection 153CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 36(1)(ii)Section 40

…-Mandovi Motors Pvt Ltd V ACT, 8 taxmann.com 225 (Bangalore)(2010), Hon’ble Delhi High Court- AMD Metplast (P) ltd V DCIT (2012) 20 taxmann.com 647 (Delhi), Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Chryscapital Investment Advisors (India) P Ltd V DCIT(2015) 232 Taxmann 20/56 Taxmann.com 417, in support of its claim of payments made. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the disallowance made by the AO is accordingly not warranted and hence is deleted. Consequently, the grounds raised in connection with disallowance of Rs.7,05,65,530/- made u/s. 36(1)(ii) of the Act are allowed." 15. Therefore, the le…

GBT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT,OSD, DELHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed as above

ITA 1764/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.1764/Del/2022, A.Y. 2018-19 GBT India Private Limited Assistant Commissioner G-21, Ground Floor, of Income Tax, OSD, Salcon Rasvilas, Plot No. D-1, Vs. Civic Centre, Minto Road, Saket District Centre, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AAFCG5409D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Prashant Meharchandani, Adv. Shri Jinendra Kataria, Advocate Respondent by Shri Dharm Veer Singh, CIT(DR) Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 21/11/2025 Da…

ACIT, CIRCLE- 9(1), NEW DELHI vs. FIS GLOBAL BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue and CO of the assessee are partly allowed as above for statistical purposes

ITA 372/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sudhir Pareek & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.372/Del/2018, A.Y. 2009-10 Asst. Commissioner FIS Global Business Solution India of Income Tax, (P) Ltd. [formerly known as E- Circle-9(1), Vs. Funds International India (P) Ltd.] Room No.403, S-405 (LGF), CR Building, IP Greater Kailash Part-II, New Delhi Estate PAN: AAACH2815H New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 64/Del/2018 (Arising out of ITA No.372/Del/2018, A.Y. 2009-10) FIS Global Business Solution India Asst. Commissioner (P) Ltd. [for…

FEDEX EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION AND SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 1(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4783/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Girish Agrawal ()

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144BSection 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 92CSection 92C(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No. 4783/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2020-21 FedEx Express Vs. ACIT 1(3)(1), Transportation and Mumbai Supply Chain Services Aayakar Bhavan, (India) Private Limited Mumbai-400020 Boomerang, Unit No.801, 8th Floor, Wings A & B1 Chandivali Farm Road Andheri East, Mumbai-400072 PAN:AABCF6516A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Sriram Seshadri/Ms.Amulya K. Respondent by Shri Bhagirath Ramawat, SR. D.R. Date of Hearing 03.06.2025 Date of Pronouncement 30.07.2…

ATMECS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1681/BANG/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Jun 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri P.V.S.S. Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. K.J. Dhivya
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92C

…rofitability details from 2002 – 2022 and held that turnover does not have any significance on the profit margins in software industry. He relied upon the decision of the honourable Delhi High Court in case of Chris Capital Investment Advisors Private Limited 376 ITR 183 and held that when the comparable companies which are otherwise functionally comparable cannot be excluded merely on account of high turnover particularly when the assessee has not demonstrated as to how the turnover has materially affected the profitability or comparability. Thus, the learned transfer pricing officer rejected the objection of th…

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. FIS GLOBAL BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the revenue stand dismissed and both Cos are allowed as above

ITA 2387/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA (Accountant Member)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’: NEW DELHI BEFORESHRISUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.5939/Del./2012, A.Y. 2007-08 ITA No.2387/Del./2014, A.Y. 2008-09 Dy. Commissioner FIS Global Business Solution India of Income Tax, (P) Ltd.[formerly known as E-Funds Circle 11(1), Vs. International India (P) Ltd.] Room No. 312, S-405 (LGF), Greater Kailash, Part-II C.R.Building, New Delhi-110048 New Delhi PAN: AAACH2815H (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 03/Del/2013 (Arising out of ITA No.5939/Del./2012, A.Y. 2007-08) C.O. No. 02/Del/2015 (Arising out o…

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. FIS GLOBAL BUSINESS SOLUTION INDIA (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the revenue stand dismissed and both Cos are allowed as above

ITA 5939/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRISUDHIR KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA (Accountant Member)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’: NEW DELHI BEFORESHRISUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.5939/Del./2012, A.Y. 2007-08 ITA No.2387/Del./2014, A.Y. 2008-09 Dy. Commissioner FIS Global Business Solution India of Income Tax, (P) Ltd.[formerly known as E-Funds Circle 11(1), Vs. International India (P) Ltd.] Room No. 312, S-405 (LGF), Greater Kailash, Part-II C.R.Building, New Delhi-110048 New Delhi PAN: AAACH2815H (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 03/Del/2013 (Arising out of ITA No.5939/Del./2012, A.Y. 2007-08) C.O. No. 02/Del/2015 (Arising out o…

OSI SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 2379/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita No.2379/Hyd/2018 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Darpan Kirpalani, ARFor Respondent: Shri B.Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI MANJUNATHA G., ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No.2379/Hyd/2018 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) OSI Systems Private Dy.Commissioner of Limited Vs. Income Tax, Hyderabad Circle-16(2), [PAN : AAACO4438M] Hyderabad अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent धििााररती द्वारा/Assessee by: Shri Darpan Kirpalani, AR राजस्‍व द्वारा/Revenue by: Shri B.Balakrishna, CIT-DR सुिवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 01/10/2024 घोर्णा की तारीख/Pronouncement on:…

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SONY INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed as indicated above and appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1166/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Aug 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s. Sony India Private Limited, vs. DCIT, Circle 24 (1), A-18, Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 044. (PAN : AABCS1571Q) DCIT, Circle 24 (1), vs. M/s. Sony India Private Limited, New Delhi. A-18, Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, New Delhi – 110 044. (PAN : AABCS1571Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Nageshwar Rao, Advocate Shri Parth, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 19.06.2024 Date of Order…

SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed as indicated above and appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1026/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Aug 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s. Sony India Private Limited, vs. DCIT, Circle 24 (1), A-18, Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 044. (PAN : AABCS1571Q) DCIT, Circle 24 (1), vs. M/s. Sony India Private Limited, New Delhi. A-18, Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, New Delhi – 110 044. (PAN : AABCS1571Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Nageshwar Rao, Advocate Shri Parth, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 19.06.2024 Date of Order…

ADIT, CIRLCE- 1(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,, NEW DELHI vs. AMERICAN EXPRESS BANKING CORP. (INDIA BRANCH), NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 6455/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Aug 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 92C(3)Section 92F

…e to Assessee and further submitted that quantum turnover can be no reason for exclusion of a company which is otherwise comparable and relied on the Judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Chrys Capital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. (376 ITR 183). 19. We have heard the parties perused the material available on record. The Ld. CIT(A) after verifying the record found that the turnover is ITeS segment is only about Rs. 86,00,000/- out of total turnover of Rs. 7.23 Crore (i.e. 6.37 crore pertain to software services and remaining Rs. 0.86 crore pertains to ITEs Segment), whereas the turn…

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANKING CORP. (INDIA BRANCH),NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, CIRLCE- 1(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 6253/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Aug 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 92C(3)Section 92F

…e to Assessee and further submitted that quantum turnover can be no reason for exclusion of a company which is otherwise comparable and relied on the Judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Chrys Capital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. (376 ITR 183). 19. We have heard the parties perused the material available on record. The Ld. CIT(A) after verifying the record found that the turnover is ITeS segment is only about Rs. 86,00,000/- out of total turnover of Rs. 7.23 Crore (i.e. 6.37 crore pertain to software services and remaining Rs. 0.86 crore pertains to ITEs Segment), whereas the turn…

PRIMERA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 381/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri PVSS Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Smt. L. Sunitha Rao, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No. 381/Hyd/2022 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Primera Medical Technologies Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Private Limited, Income Tax, Hyderabad Circle-5(1), [PAN No. AAICP1509J] Hyderabad अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent धििााररती द्वारा / Assessee by: Shri PVSS Prasad, AR राजस्‍व द्वारा / Revenue by: Smt. L. Sunitha Rao, CIT-DR सुिवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 19/06/2024 घो…

TRINITI ADVANCED SOFTWARELABS PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS ,WARD -2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 397/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Kranthi, ARFor Respondent: Smt. L. Sunitha Rao, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No. 397/Hyd/2021 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Triniti Advanced Software Labs Vs. Income Tax Officer, Private Limited, Ward-2(4), Hyderabad Hyderabad [PAN No. AAACE7968E] अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent धििााररती द्वारा / Assessee by: Shri Kranthi, AR राजस्‍व द्वारा / Revenue by: Smt. L. Sunitha Rao, CIT-DR (appeared through virtual mode) सुिवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 21…

ISOFT HEALTH MANAGEMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 976/CHNY/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.976/Chny/2015 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 M/S. Isoft Health Management India Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, 4Th Floor, Capital . Income Tax, Towers, No. 180, Kodambakkam High Corporate Circle 2(2), Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aalcs8600A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Vikram Vijayaragahavan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 15.05.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 23.02.2015 Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri Vikram Vijayaragahavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)

…R 216] was also taken note of in PCIT Vs. Sanvih Info Group Private Limited (I.T. Appeal No.420 of 2019 (Del. HC) dated 16.05.2019. The Court noted the discussion in Chry Capital Investment Advisors India (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, [2015 376 ITR 183 (Del)], wherein it was stated that Infosys Technologies Ltd. cannot be compared with the respondent assessee (therein), as seen from the financial data and it should be excluded from the list of comparables for the reason that it was a giant Company in the area of development of software. 8. In PCIT Vs. Symphony Marketing Solutions India Pvt. Ltd…

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 vs. XL INDIA BUSINESS SERVICES PVT. LTD

ITA/978/2019HC Delhi15 Apr 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

…$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 978/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aseem Chawla, Sr.SC with Ms.Pratishtha Chaudhary, Adv. versus XL INDIA BUSINESS SERVICES PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Ananya Kapoor, Mr.Salil Kapoor and Mr.Tarun Chanana, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 15.04.2024 1. The Principal Commissioner assails the order of the Inc…

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - I vs. M/S P.R. ROLLING MILLS PVT. LTD.

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/354/2018HC Rajasthan15 Mar 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,BHUWAN GOYAL

Section 92C

…$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 354/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S CHRYS CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Srivastava, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Aggarwal and Ms. Kanika Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 23.03.2018 Admit. Issue notice. Mr. Vikas Srivastava, Advocate accepts notice on…

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 488/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala &For Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA-TP No. 488/Hyd/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Parexel International Asst. Commissioner of (India) Private Limited, Vs. Income Tax, Hyderabad Circle-5(1), [PAN No. AAECP2199N] Hyderabad अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee by: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala & Shri Yogesh Malpani, ARs रधजस्‍व द्वधरध/Revenue by: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DR सुिवधई की तधरीख/…

INFOR (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

Accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 193/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Oct 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita-Tp No. 193/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Infor (India) Private Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Hyderabad Of Income Tax, [Pan No. Aaacb6197Q] Circle-2(1), Hyderabad अपीलार्थीर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Moti Lala, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 260

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA-TP No. 193/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Infor (India) Private Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Hyderabad of Income Tax, [PAN No. AAACB6197Q] Circle-2(1), Hyderabad अपीलार्थीर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent स्‍थथगन आवेदन सं. / S.A. No. 58/Hyd/2023 (Arising out of ITA No. 193/Hyd/2023) (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Infor (India) Private Limited, Vs The Deputy…

TPG SOFTWARE PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-25(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 6468/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: FixedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharatdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Vishal Kalra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234Section 271(1)(c)Section 92C(3)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Kul Bharat, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 6468/Del/2018: Asstt. Year: 2014-15 TPG Software Pvt. Ltd, Vs. DCIT, Candor Techspace, B-2, Tower-3, Circle-25(2), Sector-62, Noida New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AADCT8715F Assessee by : Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 20.06.2023 Date of Pronouncement: 11.09.2023 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 29.08.2018 passed by the…

Showing 1–20 of 170 · Page 1 of 9

...
Chryscapital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (376 ITR 183) — Cited in 170 Judgments | BharatTax