Checkmate Services (P) Ltd. v. CIT
290 Taxmann 19Supreme Court of India2023#1710 most cited
What is Checkmate Services (P) Ltd. v. CIT authority for?
Employees' contributions to provident fund or ESI, if deposited by the employer after the due dates specified under the respective welfare fund Acts, are not allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, even if deposited before the due date for filing the income tax return. Such disallowance can be made as an adjustment under Section 143(1)(a).
67
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Checkmate Services · 36(1)(va) · 43B · 2(24)(x) · 143(1)(a) · employees contribution PF · delayed deposit ESI · provident fund deduction · ESIC deduction · Aimil Ltd. overruled
Also reported as
2022 SCC OnLine SC 14237 Taxmann.com 178
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Checkmate Services (P) Ltd. v. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 67 · Page 1 of 4