ROHDA SPECIALTIY CHEMICALS INDIA LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT CIR 6(1), MUMBAI
Appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law
ITA 830/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Apr 2017AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri C.N. Prasadita No. 830/Mum/2014 : (A.Y : 2009-10) M/S Rhodia Specialty Chemicals Vs. Addl. Cit – Circle 6(1) India Ltd. (Formerly Known As Room No.511, Aayakar Bhawan M/S Albright & Wilson Chemicals Mk Road India Ltd.), Phoenix House, A Wing New Marine Lines 4Th Floor, 462 Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai – 400 020 Lower Parel (West) Mumbai – 400 013 Pan : Aaaca3841L Ita No. 622/Mum/2014 : (A.Y : 2009-10) Dcit -7(2) Vs. M/S Rhodia Specialty Chemicals Room No.624, Mk Road India Ltd. (Formerly Known As Mumbai – 400 020 M/S Albright & Wilson Chemicals India Ltd.), Phoenix House, A Wing 4Th Floor, 462 Senapati Bapat Marg Lower Parel (West) Mumbai – 400 013 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri Manish V ShahFor Respondent: Shri Rajguru M
Section 143(3)
…Raymond Ltd. V. DCIT 86 lTD 791 (Mumbai) Wherein the Hon'ble Tribunal held that the services rendered abroad by overseas lead managers in connection managerial GDR issue did not "make available" the services to the person receiving it. In CESC Ltd. v. DCIT 80 TTJ 806 (Cal) (TM), the Hon'ble Tribunal held that the services rendered abroad for opining and reviewing the project details did not "Make available" services to the person receiving it. Hence, the technical services fee paid to RAP by AWCI is not FTS under Article 12 of the said Treaty.” 30. In the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessee did not…