Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Limited v. ITO

112 ITR 592High Court1978#5934 most cited

What is Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Limited v. ITO authority for?

A disallowance of expenses solely due to the deeming fiction of Section 40(a)(ia) does not automatically amount to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, and therefore, does not attract penalty under Section 271(1)(c).

19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Limited v. ITO · 112 ITR 592 · Section 271(1)(c) · Section 40(a)(ia) · inaccurate particulars of income · concealment of income · penalty for disallowance of expenses

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Limited v. ITO

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 80/RJT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.76 To 80/Rjt/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष /Assessment Year: 2008-09 To 2012-13 & आयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No. 81/Rjt/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Pankaj Chimanlal Lodhiya 3Rd Floor, Parth, Diwanpara Main Road, Rajkot-3600 001 Pan: Aampl 3903 F (अपीलार्थी/Assessee) बनाम Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle-2 Rajkot, 2Nd Floor, Amruta Estate, M.G. Rad, Rajkot-360 001 (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ar राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/03/2025 : 30/04/2025 Order Per Bench, Captioned Six Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To The Assessment Years (Ays) 2008-09 To 2012-13 & Ay 2014-15, Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), (“Ld.Cit(A)” For Short) Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act" For Short), Which In Turn Arise Out Of Separate Penalty Orders, Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) & 271Aab(1)(C) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 40

…es itself is not a case of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. In this connection reliance is placed on the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Kolkata in the case of Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Limited v. ITO, 112 ITR 592. In connection to the above, it is submitted that it is well settled proposition of law the legal fiction crated by section 40(a)(ia) will not apply to the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the disallowance made simply by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act will not attract penalty for furnishing of inaccurate partic…

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACTIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 77/RJT/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.76 To 80/Rjt/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष /Assessment Year: 2008-09 To 2012-13 & आयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No. 81/Rjt/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Pankaj Chimanlal Lodhiya 3Rd Floor, Parth, Diwanpara Main Road, Rajkot-3600 001 Pan: Aampl 3903 F (अपीलार्थी/Assessee) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ar राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/04/2025 Order Per Bench, Captioned Six Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To The Assessment Years (Ays) 2008-09 To 2012-13 & Ay 2014-15, Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), (“Ld.Cit(A)” For Short) Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act" For Short), Which In Turn Arise Out Of Separate Penalty Orders, Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) & 271Aab(1)(C) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 40

…es itself is not a case of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. In this connection reliance is placed on the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Kolkata in the case of Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Limited v. ITO, 112 ITR 592. In connection to the above, it is submitted that it is well settled proposition of law the legal fiction crated by section 40(a)(ia) will not apply to the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the disallowance made simply by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act will not attract penalty for furnishing of inaccurate partic…

DCIT-2(2), MUMBAI vs. N.W. EXPORTS LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, all appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4456/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.4456/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2004-2005) Dcit-2(2), Mumbai-20 Vs. N.W.Exports Limited, Neville House, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400001 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 2021 P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Sumit Kumar ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Yogesh A.Thar सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 18/11/2015 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 03/02/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A)-5, Mumbai, Dated 14-02-2013, For The Assessment Year 2004-2005, In The Matter Of Imposition Of Penalty U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Act. 2. Rival Contentions Have Been Heard & Record Perused. Facts In Brief Are That The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In The Business Of Trading & Exports Of Textile Goods. The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income Declaring Total Income At Nil. The Ao Asked The Assessee To Furnish Various Details. Being Not Convinced With The Explanation Of Assessee, The Ao Made Addition Of Rs.40 Lakhs Towards Services Charges Received By The Assessee As Unexplained Cash Credit U/S.68 Of The Act & Levied Penalty On The Same. In Appeal, The Cit(A) Deleted The Penalty After Having Following Observation :- 3.3 The Facts Of The Case Have Been Considered: • The Appellant Has Stated That The Figure Of Net Profit After Tax Amounting To Rs.1,38,18,629/- As Per P&L A/C Includes The Figure Of Rs. 40 Lacs Under The Head "Other Income". The Ao Has Again Added Back The Said Figure Of Rs. 40 Lacs As Unexplained Cash Credit U/S 68. • No Penalty Can Be Levied In The Event Of Change Of Head By The Assessing Authority Acit V/S Niraj Birla Mumbai Tribunal Ita No 3259/97 Ay. 92-93 Order Dated 09.07.2003/Krishna N. Bhojwani

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh A.TharFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar
Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ ‘बी’, म ुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.4456/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2004-2005) DCIT-2(2), Mumbai-20 Vs. N.W.Exports Limited, Neville House, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400001 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AAACN 2021 P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Sumit Kumar ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Yogesh A.Thar सुनवाई की तायीख / Date of Hearing : 18/11/2015 घोषणा की तायीख/Date of…

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Limited v. ITO (112 ITR 592) — Cited in 19 Judgments | BharatTax