B.A. Balasubramaniam & Bros. Co. v. CIT
116 Taxmann 842Supreme Court of India2001#3075 most cited
What is B.A. Balasubramaniam & Bros. Co. v. CIT authority for?
Where the difference between the returned and assessed income exceeds 20%, Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) applies, and the assessee must discharge the onus to rebut the inference of concealment.
39
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.
Also referred to as
B.A. Balasubramaniam & Bros. Co. v. CIT · section 271(1)(c) · penalty · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · difference between returned and assessed income · explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) · onus on assessee · bona fide mistake
Also reported as
157 CTR 556
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing B.A. Balasubramaniam & Bros. Co. v. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2