Asstt. CIT v. Nimbus Communications

34 Taxmann.com 298Reported decision2013#4847 most cited

What is Asstt. CIT v. Nimbus Communications authority for?

No separate adjustment for interest is required if the arm's length price (ALP) of a sale or service transaction, including the provision of a corporate guarantee, has already been determined. Overdue debts and the timing of payment realization are incidental to business transactions and not independent international transactions requiring separate adjustment.

24

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Asstt. CIT v. Nimbus Communications · corporate guarantee · arm's length price · transfer pricing · interest adjustment · overdue debts · incidental to transaction

Judgments citing Asstt. CIT v. Nimbus Communications

Ocimum Bio Solutions (I) Ltd., Hyd, Hyderabad vs. ACIT, Circle-16(2), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 280/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 280/Hyd/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) M/S. Ocimum Bio Solutions Asst. Commissioner Of (I) Ltd., Vs. Income Tax, Hyderabad Circle- 16(2), [Pan No. Aaaco4095L] Hyderabad अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No. 280/Hyd/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) M/s. Ocimum Bio Solutions Asst. Commissioner of (I) Ltd., Vs. Income Tax, Hyderabad Circle- 16(2), [PAN No. AAACO4095L] Hyderabad अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee by: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, AR रधजस्‍व द्वधरध / Revenue by: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date of hearing: 15/03/2023 घ…

Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd., Ahmedabad vs. DCIT Circle-2(1) (2), Ahmedabad

In the result appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 91/AHD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.91/Ahd/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. D.C.I.T., Lambda House, Vs. Circle-2(1)(2), Opp. Gujarat High Court, Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway, Gota, Ahmedabad-382481. Pan: Aaacl4089R

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parimalsingh B ParmarFor Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr.D.R
Section 2Section 234ASection 271Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘’ D’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD (CONDUCTED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT AT AHMEDABAD) BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.91/AHD/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. D.C.I.T., Lambda House, Vs. Circle-2(1)(2), Opp. Gujarat High Court, Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway, Gota, Ahmedabad-382481. PAN: AAACL4089R And आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 409/AHD/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 A.C.I.T., Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. Circle-2(1)(2), Vs. Lambda Hous…

The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(2), Ahmedabad vs. Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd., Ahmedabad

In the result appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 409/AHD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.91/Ahd/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. D.C.I.T., Lambda House, Vs. Circle-2(1)(2), Opp. Gujarat High Court, Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway, Gota, Ahmedabad-382481. Pan: Aaacl4089R

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parimalsingh B ParmarFor Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr.D.R
Section 2Section 234ASection 271Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘’ D’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD (CONDUCTED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT AT AHMEDABAD) BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.91/AHD/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. D.C.I.T., Lambda House, Vs. Circle-2(1)(2), Opp. Gujarat High Court, Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway, Gota, Ahmedabad-382481. PAN: AAACL4089R And आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 409/AHD/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 A.C.I.T., Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. Circle-2(1)(2), Vs. Lambda Hous…

Asstt. CIT v. Nimbus Communications (34 Taxmann.com 298) — Cited in 24 Judgments | BharatTax