Asstt. CIT v. Hotel Blue Moon

188 Taxmann 113Supreme Court of India2010#1360 most cited

What is Asstt. CIT v. Hotel Blue Moon authority for?

Issuance of a notice under Section 143(2) within the prescribed period of limitation is mandatory for completing an assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act. Section 292BB does not cure the failure to issue such a mandatory notice within the limitation period.

84

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Asstt. CIT v. Hotel Blue Moon · Section 143(2) notice · mandatory notice · limitation period 143(2) · Section 143(3) assessment · Section 292BB · non-issuance of notice · validity of assessment · procedural requirement · assessment quashed

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Asstt. CIT v. Hotel Blue Moon

SITANSHU GUPTA,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DEHRADUN

In the result, this appeal is allowed

ITA 67/DDN/2026[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar Us & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.67/Ddn/2026 निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sitanshu Gupta, Income Tax Officer, बिधम 100/100, Block 2, Ward 2(4), Dehradun, Vs. Lunia Mohalla, Dehradun, Uttrakhand. Uttrakhand 248001. Pan No.Bdmps2841B अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Advocate Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr 06.04.2026 सुिवधईकीतधरीख/ Date Of Hearing: 15.04.2026 उद्घोर्णधकीतधरीख/Pronouncement On आदेश /O R D E R Per Sanjay Awasthi:

Section 143(2)Section 148Section 250Section 292B

…ITA No. 67/DDN/2026 SITANSHU GUPTA, DEHRADUN IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “DB” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.67/DDN/2026 निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13 SITANSHU GUPTA, INCOME TAX OFFICER, बिधम 100/100, Block 2, Ward 2(4), DEHRADUN, Vs. Lunia Mohalla, DEHRADUN, UTTRAKHAND. UTTRAKHAND 248001. PAN No.BDMPS2841B अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee by Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Advocate Revenue by Ms. Poonam Sharma, CIT DR 06.04.2026 सुिवधईकीतधरीख/ Date of hearing: 15.04.2026 उद्घोर्णधकीतधरीख/Pr…

TIKA RAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,SONIPAT, HARYANA vs. DCIT/ACIT(E)(C-2), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1140/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1140/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Tika Ram Educational The Dcit/ Acit, बनाम Society, C-2, Crz Senior Secondary School, Chandigarh Vs. West Ram Nagar, Sonepat 131001 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. Aabtt1486A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. Dhruv Goel, Ca राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12-8-2025 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.11.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, Am: Appeal In This Case Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 22.10.2204 Of Ld. Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi For A.Y. 2015-16. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:

For Appellant: Sh. Dhruv Goel, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 144Section 148

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1140/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Tika Ram Educational The DCIT/ ACIT, बनाम Society, C-2, CRZ Senior Secondary School, Chandigarh Vs. West Ram Nagar, Sonepat 131001 "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO. AABTT1486A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Dhruv Goel, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. Addl. CIT, Sr. DR सुनवा…

Showing 120 of 84 · Page 1 of 5