Article 19. In CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd.

1 SCR 934Reported decision1967#21884 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2021.

Judgments citing Article 19. In CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2, DELHI vs. PT LP DISPLAY INDONESIA

ITA/145/2021HC Delhi21 Sept 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

Section 34Section 89

…2023:DHC:1902 OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 145/2021 Page 114 of 133 not possible to treat the company as a citizen for the purposes of Article 19. In CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd. [CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd., (1967) 1 SCR 934 : AIR 1967 SC 819] the corporate veil was lifted and evasion of income tax prevented by paying regard to the economic realities behind the legal facade. In Workmen v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. [Workmen v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd., (1985) 4 SCC 114 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 957] resort was had to the principle of lifting the veil to prev…

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3, vs. SHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.

ITA/461/2018HC Delhi17 Apr 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 9

…hareholders of the company. The request of the company was turned down on the ground that it was not possible to treat the company as a citizen for the purposes of Article 19. In CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd. [CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd., (1967) 1 SCR 934 : AIR 1967 SC 819] the corporate veil was lifted and evasion of income tax prevented by paying regard to the economic realities behind the legal facade. In Workmen v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. [Workmen v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd., (1985) 4 SCC 114 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 957] resort was had to the principle of lifting the veil t…

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-3 vs. HFCL INFOTEL LTD.

ITA/460/2018HC Delhi16 Apr 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 9

…hareholders of the company. The request of the company was turned down on the ground that it was not possible to treat the company as a citizen for the purposes of Article 19. In CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd. [CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd., (1967) 1 SCR 934 : AIR 1967 SC 819] the corporate veil was lifted and evasion of income tax prevented by paying regard to the economic realities behind the legal facade. In Workmen v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. [Workmen v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd., (1985) 4 SCC 114 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 957] resort was had to the principle of lifting the veil t…

Article 19. In CIT v. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd. (1 SCR 934) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax