Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Ankit Aqrochem (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT Rajasthan High Court come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 147, Section 148, Section 68, Section 132(4), Section 142(1), Section 143(1).

Ankit Aqrochem (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT Rajasthan High Court

Q: How many judgments cite Ankit Aqrochem (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT Rajasthan High Court?

51 judgments on BharatTax cite Ankit Aqrochem (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT Rajasthan High Court (89 Taxmann.com 45), spanning 2018 to 2026.

89 Taxmann.com 45High Court2018#2255 most cited

What is Ankit Aqrochem (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT Rajasthan High Court authority for?

An assessee cannot object to reassessment proceedings by demanding the source of information that led the Assessing Officer to believe that income had escaped assessment. Reassessment is justified when based on information from authorities like the Director of Income Tax (DIT) about bogus accommodation entries.

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Ankit Aqrochem · reassessment · section 147 · section 148 · DIT information · bogus accommodation entries · share application money · source of information · escaped assessment

Sections most often in play

Section 147 Section 148 Section 68 Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 149

Issues it is cited on

section 147(b)section 147(1)section 147(a)sanction under section 151 approval under section 151 live link third party information section 43ca section 151(1)borrowed satisfaction beyond four years non application of mind

Judgments citing Ankit Aqrochem (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT Rajasthan High Court

Meena Jewels and Pearls, Hyderabad vs. ACIT., Circle-5(1), Hyderabad

ITA 1225/HYD/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Feb 2026AY 2010-11

For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…1 ITA.No. 1225/Hyd./2024 आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No.1225/Hyd./2024 Assessment Year 2010-2011 Meena Jewels and The ACIT, Pearls, Hyderabad. vs. Circle-5(1), Telangana. Hyderabad. PAN AAMFM8114F (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धारिती द्वारा / Assessee by: CA P Murali Mohan Rao राजस्व द्वारा / Revenue by: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 21.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Pronouncement: 25.02.2026 आदेश/ORDER PER VIJAY PAL RAO, V.…

Imran Ahmad, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh vs. Income Tax Officer, Moradabad

Appeal is partly allowed

ITA 3490/DEL/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Dec 2025AY 2013-2014

Section 139Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2013-14 Sh. Imran Ahmad, Vs. Income Tax officer, Gali No. 10, Ashrafi Empire, Civil Line, Zahid Nagar, Karoola, Moradabad Moradabad PAN: AEFPA3482F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR Date of hearing 03.12.2025 Date of pronouncement 03.12.2025 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Fac…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Moderate Credit Corporation Pvt. Ltd., West Bengal

ITA 6223/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Mar 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 147

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SH. AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 6206/Del/2015: Assessment Year: 2007-08 ITA No. 6207/Del/2015: Assessment Year: 2008-09 ITA No. 6208/Del/2015: Assessment Year: 2009-10 ITA No. 6209/Del/2015: Assessment Year: 2010-11 ITA No. 6210/Del/2015: Assessment Year: 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner of Income Vs. Green Mark Infra Limited, Tax, Central Circle-18, Income 5/5761, Dev Nagar, Karol Bagh, Tax Office, ARA Centre, Near Yes Bank ATM, New Delhi Jhandewala, New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT)…

Rahul Jabarmal Jain, Mumbai vs. Assistant. Commissioner of Income Tax -19(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal is accordingly partly allowed for statistical purposes in the above terms

ITA 3525/MUM/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri B R Baskaran & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanrahul Jabarmal Jain Vs. Acit 19(3) 1204/B 12 Floor, Pratiksha Tower, R. 5Th Floor, Piramal Chamber, S. Nimkar Marg, Mumbai Central, Lalbaug, Mumbai-400 012 Mumbai-400 008 Pan: Aempj8236K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 37

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B R BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Rahul Jabarmal Jain Vs. ACIT 19(3) 1204/B 12 floor, Pratiksha Tower, R. 5th floor, Piramal Chamber, S. Nimkar Marg, Mumbai Central, Lalbaug, Mumbai-400 012 Mumbai-400 008 PAN: AEMPJ8236K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented by : Shri Rajkumar Singh, Ld. AR Department Represented by : Ms. Monika H. Pande, Ld. DR Date of conclusion of Hearing : 06.12.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 05.03.2025 O R D E R PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (J.M.): 1. This appeal is filed by…

Narendra Khimji Savla, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(1)(1), Mumbai

ITA 6566/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai ()

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) I.T.A. No. 6566/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Narendra Khimji Savla 34, Uma Building, Opp. Kirti College, Kashinath Dhuru Road, Dadar 400028. PAN: AHEPS9345P (Appellant) Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(1)(1) Aayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Karve Road, Churchgate 400020. (Respondent) Appellant by Shri. Himanshu Gandhi Respondent by Shri. Sajit Nair SR. DR. Date of Hearing 11/02/2025 Date of Pronouncement 20/02/2025 ORDER Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.: The present appeal filed by the assessee arises out of order dated 30/…

Ebrahim Essa Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs. ITO-9(2)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1188/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ebrahim Essa Developers Pvt. Ltd., Ito-9(2)(4), 115 Dathawala Wstate, Sv Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Jogeshwari West, 400 102. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aacce 4720 E Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Hemanshu Joshi, DRFor Respondent: Mr. Prateek Jain

Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “E” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ebrahim Essa Developers Pvt. Ltd., ITO-9(2)(4), 115 Dathawala Wstate, SV Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Jogeshwari West, 400 102. Mumbai-400020. PAN NO. AACCE 4720 E Appellant Respondent : Mr. Prateek Jain Assessee by : Mr. Hemanshu Joshi, DR Revenue by : 05/12/2024 Date of Hearing Date of pronouncement : 11/12/2024 ORDER PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 22.01.2024 passed by the Ld. Commis…

Gemco International, Jaipur vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1), Jaipur

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed with no order as to cost

ITA 410/JPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur04 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vivek Bhargava, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary,JCIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, ‘’SMC” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 410/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/s. Gemco International cuke The ITO Vs. 3950, Lal Haweli, MSB Ka Rasta Ward 2(1) Johari Bazar, Jaipur 302 003 Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAJFG 9238 R vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assessee by : Shri Vivek Bhargava, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@Revenue by: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary,JCIT-DR…

Kissan Fats Ltd., Bathinda vs. DCIT, CC-1, Ludhiana

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 408/CHANDI/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151(1)Section 250(6)Section 253

…missed as reported at (2017) 84 Taxmann.com 300. The Ld. CIT(A) then has relied upon the following judgments of High Courts (i) Pushpa Uttam Chand Mehta Vs. ITO (2022) 139 taxmann.com 409 (Gujarat) (ii) Ankit Agrochem(P) Ltd. Vs. JCIT, Range-1, Bikaner (2018) 89 Taxmann.com 45(Rajasthan) (iii) Aradhna Estate (P) ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1) (2018) 91 Taxmann.com 119 (Gujarat), (iv) AGR Investment Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (2011) 197 Taxmann.com 177 (Delhi) and one judgement of ITAT, Agra reported in case of Anil Kumar Singhal Vs. ITO, Ward-1(1) Agra (2013) 33 Taxmann.com 434 (Agra Trib). Basis…

Bharath Hi-Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore vs. Dy. CIT, Circle-1(1)(2), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1034/BANG/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Mar 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K, Vice- & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Sri.Inder Paul Bansal & Sri.Vivek BansalFor Respondent: Sri.Nilanjan Dey, Addl.CIT-DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 153ASection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE Before Shri George George K, Vice-President & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member ITA No.1034/Bang/2023 : Asst.Year 2009-2010 Bharath Hi-Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. The Deputy Commissioner of 304 & 306 Gold Tower, 3rd Floor Income-tax, Circle 1(1)(2) v. Gold Residency Road Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 025. PAN : AAACK8043N. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.Inder Paul Bansal & Sri.Vivek Bansal Respondent by : Sri.Nilanjan Dey, Addl.CIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 11.03.2024 Date of Hearing : 07.03.2024 O R D E R Per George George K, V…

Vilson Roofing Products Private Limited, Kolhapur vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Kolhapur

The appeal of the assessee is DISMISSED

ITA 956/PUN/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Dec 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 956/Pun/2023 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Vilson Roofing Products Pvt. Ltd., 1St Lane, Opp. Prataprao Jagdale Hall, Rajarampuri, Kolhapur, Pin – 416 008 . . . . . . . अपऩलधथी / Appellant Pan: Aaccv0661M

For Appellant: Mr Sharad Vaze [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M G Jasnani [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253(1)(a)Section 68

…॥ आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण, पुणे “बी” न्यायपीठ, पुणे में ॥ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE “B” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपऩल सं. / ITA No. 956/PUN/2023 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Vilson Roofing Products Pvt. Ltd., 1st Lane, Opp. Prataprao Jagdale Hall, Rajarampuri, Kolhapur, Pin – 416 008 . . . . . . . अपऩलधथी / Appellant PAN: AACCV0661M बनाम / V/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, . . . . . . . प्रत्यथी / Respondent Central Circle, Kolhapur द्वारा / Appearances Assessee by : Mr Sharad Vaze [‘Ld…

Nahta Trading Co., Jhalawar vs. ITO Ward Jhalawar, Jhalawar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 449/JPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Devang Gargieya (Adv. )For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl. CIT)

Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 234A

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,o aJh jkBksM deys' kt;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 449/JPR/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2013-14 Nahta Trading Co. cuke ITO, 0 Bhawani Mandi, Vs. Ward, Jhalawar. Jhalawar-326502. LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAAFN 8982 C vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assesseeby : Shri Devang Gargieya (Adv. ) jktLo dh vksj ls@Revenue by : Smt. Monis…

Shri Khandelwal Diamonds Private Limited, Jaipur vs. ACIT, Circle 1, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 375/JPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Him On The Reason Of Issuing Notice U/S 148 On Borrowed Satisfaction Of Another Wing Of The Department.

For Appellant: Sh. Mukesh Khandelwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Anup Singh (Addl. CIT) a

Section 143(3)Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 375/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2012-13 cuke Shri Khandelwal Diamonds Private ACIT, Limited, Vs. Circle-01, Jaipur 205-206, C. K. House, IInd Floor, Bichun Market, Kishanpole Bazar, Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAPCS 6518 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 3(2)(2), Mumbai vs. Phulchand Exports Private Limited, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue and cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 7214/MUM/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Shankarlal JainFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Raj

Section 147

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOs. 7214, 7212 & 7213/MUM/2017 (A.Y. 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12) DCIT – 3(2)(2) v. M/s. Phulchand Exports Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 674, 6th Floor 254B, 4th Floor, Nirlon House Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Dr. Annie Besant Road Mumbai - 400020 Worli, Mumbai - 400030 PAN: AAACP2529C (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA.No. 746/MUM/2017 (A.Y. 2009-10) ACIT – 3(2)(2) v. M/s. Phulchand Exports Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 608 67, Bajaj Bhavan, Nariman Point Aayakar Bhavan, M.K…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 3(2)(2), Mumbai vs. Phulchand Exports Private Limited, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue and cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 7213/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Shankarlal JainFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Raj

Section 147

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 3(2)(2), Mumbai vs. Phulchand Exports Private Limited, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue and cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 7212/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Shankarlal JainFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Raj

Section 147

DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur vs. Shri Prakash Chand Kothari, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1298/JPR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. B. K. Gupta (PCIT)

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES ‘B’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1190/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2011-12 cuke Shri Prakash Chand Kothari DCIT, Vs. B-4A, Kothari House, Prithviraj Road, Central Circle-02, C- Scheme, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAPBK2884R vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1298/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2011-12 cuke T…

Shri Prakash Chand Kothari, Jaipur vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1190/JPR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. B. K. Gupta (PCIT)

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 153C

J.D. Sons Steel Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad vs. ACIT, Faridabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1061/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Takiyar, Sr.D.R

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 148(2)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “D” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & Dr. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.1060 & 1061/DEL/2015 Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2009-10 J.D. Sons Steel Pvt. Ltd., v. ACIT, B-17, First Floor, Circle-II, Nehru Ground, NIT, Faridabad. Faridabad. TAN/PAN: AAACJ9814A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Rajesh Jain, CA Respondent by: Shri Umesh Takiyar, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing: 05 07 2021 Date of pronouncement: 31 08 2021 O R D E R PER, AMIT SHUKLA, J.M. The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against separate impugned ord…

Madhu Apartment Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 3870/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Feb 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Suresh K. Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Prakash Dubey , Sr. DR

Section 147Section 151Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “SMC-1” : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.Nos.3869 & 3870/Del./2018 Assessment Years 2009-2010 & 2010-2011 M/s. Madhu Apartment The Income Tax Officer, Private Limited, B-29, P-1, vs. Ward – 16 (1), Ashok Vihar, Delhi-052. PAN New Delhi. AAACM0148E (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Suresh K. Gupta, C.A. For Revenue : Shri Prakash Dubey , Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 21.01.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 01.02.2021 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee has been directed again…

Madhu Apartment Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 3869/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Feb 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Suresh K. Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Prakash Dubey , Sr. DR

Section 147Section 151Section 68