SHRI GUN NIDHAN SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed partly
ITA 1251/JPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 May 2021AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 1251/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2014-15 Shri Gun Nidhan Singh, Cuke I.T.O., Vs. 3, Telephone Colony, Tonk Road, Ward-2(3), Jaipur. Jaipur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Abgps 9249 E Appellant Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By: Shri Mahendra Gargieya & Shri Dewang Gargieya (Advs) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Jcit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 18/03/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 24/05/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Jaipur Dated 05/08/2019 For The A.Y. 2014-15. The Grounds Taken By The Assessee Are As Under:
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 244ASection 69A
…bility of the income though admitted and assessed of the preceding years.” 5. Supporting Case Laws: (i) CIT v/s P.V. Bhoopathy (2006) 205 CTR 495 (Mad) held (ii) CIT vs Kulwant Rai (2007) 210 CTR 380 (Delhi) para 16-17 (iii) Anand Prakash Soni v/s DCIT (2006) 101 TTJ 97 (Jd) para 5-6 (iv) Shivcharan Dass vs. CIT (1980) 126 ITR 0263 (P&H) 6. The various case laws cited before the ld. CIT(A) strongly and directly supporting the case of the appellant, were completely ignored by the ld. CIT(A) in as much as he is not whispered a single word thereon. The cited decisions were mostly of Hon’ble High Court and the ld. CI…