CREDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE & INVESTMENT BANK,MUMBAI vs. THE DY.CIT OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONSL TAXATION) -2(1) (1) , MUMBAI
Accordingly these grounds are dismissed as not pressed
ITA 1234/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Smt Beena Pillai, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am I.T. (Tp) A. No. 1479/Mum/2015 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) Credit Agricole Corporate & Dcit (International Taxation)- Investment Bank (Formerly 2(1)(1), 1St Floor, Room No. 136, Known As ‘Calyon Bank’) Vs. 11Th Floor, Hoechst House, Scindia House, N.M. Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Ballard Pier, Mumbai-400038. Pan: Aaccc3872B Appellant) : Respondent)
Section 143(3)
…issue is now covered against the assessee by the decision of special bench of this Tribunal in case of New India Industries Ltd. V. ACIT (18 SOT 51) as well as the decision coordinate Bench in case of Ahmadabad and Gujarat Gas Financial Services Ltd. V. ACIT (307 ITR 370). 45. Before us, the learned AR has fairly conceded that this issue is covered against the assessee by the decision of the Special Bench of this Tribunal. Accordingly, we decide this issue against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.” 23. The facts for the year under consideration being identical, respectfully following the decision of the…