Agrawal Coal Corporation P. Ltd. v. Addl

135 ITD 270Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#8758 most cited
12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2023.

Judgments citing Agrawal Coal Corporation P. Ltd. v. Addl

LEELA G. . LALWANI,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 23(2)(4), MUMBAI

Appeal stand dismissed

ITA 6399/MUM/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Aug 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.6399/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2003-04) Leela G.Lalwani Income Tax Officer 23(2)(4) J-301, Vardhaman Nagar बनाम/ C-10, Pratyakshkar Bhavan 2Nd Floor, Bandra Kurla Complex Jn Of R.P., R.D. & M.G.Road, Vs. Mulund(W), Mumbai-400 080 Bandra, Mumbai-400 007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaapl-4174-A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Revenueby : Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Ld.Dr Assessee By : Rajesh Athavale, Ld.Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 05/07/2018 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 01/08/2018 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Rajesh Athavale, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Ld.DR
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…The assessee is also one of the beneficiaries of such camouflage. Thus, when the total transaction is illusory/bogus. Our view find supports from the ratio laid down by the Indore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Agarwal Cole Corporation (63 DTR 201; 135 ITD 270)(Indore Bench of the Tribunal), wherein, one of us (Judicial Member) is signatory to the order. The ratio laid down in the case of CIT vs Nova Promoters and Finlease Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 324 ITR 0169 (Del.) supports our view. It is also noted that the Hon'ble Delhi High Court while coming to a particular disapproved the decision taken in CIT vs Oasis…

DANI SHARES & STOCK P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 4(1)(2), NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2425/MUM/2012[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Dec 2015AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosainआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.2425/Mum/2012 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2002-03) M/S Dani Shares & Stocks बिधम/ Income Tax Officer, Pvt Ltd., Ward 4(1)(2), Vs. 12, Oricon House, Aayakar Bhavan, 14, K Dubash Marg, M K Road, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400001 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabcg1670N (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. अपीऱाथी की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Sanjay Parikh प्रत्यथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Mrt.Anu K Aggarwal सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing :3.12.2015 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement :3.12.2015 O R D E R Per B.R.Baskaran,Am: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Challenging The Order Dated 11.01.2012 Passed By Ld Cit(A) For Assessment Year 2002-03 In Respect Of The Following Two Issues:- (A) Disallowance Of 10% Of Foreign Travel Expenses (B) Disallowance Of Medical Expenses Incurred On The Father Of The Director. 2. We Heard The Parties & Perused The Record. The Assessee Company Is A Member Of Bse, Engaged In The Business Of Share Trading, Broking & Investments. The First Issue Relates To The Disallowance Made

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay ParikhFor Respondent: Mrt.Anu K Aggarwal

…lowed balance amount of claim. 3. The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee is a company and hence the question of personal expenses does not arise in case of companies. In this regard, the assessee placed reliance on the decisions reported in 86 ITD 135(TM) and 135 ITD 270. However, we notice that the assessee has admitted that 10% of foreign travel expenses as related to the personal expenses of the directors, meaning thereby, the expenses to that extent could not be considered as having laid out for the purposes of business. Hence, we are of the view that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in sustaining the disallowance…

Agrawal Coal Corporation P. Ltd. v. Addl (135 ITD 270) — Cited in 12 Judgments | BharatTax