BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI
The appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed and appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 5963/DEL/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jun 2025AY 2008-09
Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri Amitabh Shuklaआअसं.5692 और5693/िद"ी /2019(िन.व. 2007-08 और2008-09)
For Appellant: S/Shri Rohit Jain, Deepesh Jain, Advocates and Shri Shivam Gupta, Chartered AccoFor Respondent: Shri Javed Akhtar, CIT(DR)
Section 195Section 40
…g State, thus, the assessee had no reason to doubt or dispute the same. In support of his submissions, the ld. Counsel placed reliance on CBDT Circular no. 789 dated 13.04.2000 and the decision rendered in the case of ADIT vs Universal International Music BV, 141 TTJ 364 (Mumbai). The ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that considering TRCs issued by Swedish Tax Authorities, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the taxability of payments made to ABN Amro was to be determined with reference to the provisions of Article 11 of the Indo-Sweden DTAA, to the extent it was more beneficial as compared…