ACIT v. Saveeta Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
25 Taxmann.com 138Reported decision2012#3845 most cited
What is ACIT v. Saveeta Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences authority for?
An addition to income based solely on a sworn statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act is not sustainable and such admission cannot be treated as a valid piece of evidence, especially when it is self-incriminating.
31
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2026.
Also referred to as
ACIT v. Saveeta Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences · 25 Taxmann.com 138 · section 132(4) · sworn statement · self-incriminating statement · evidence · addition to income · valid piece of evidence
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing ACIT v. Saveeta Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
Showing 1–20 of 31 · Page 1 of 2