85 (Mumbai), CIT v. Harjeev Aggarwal

134 Taxmann.com 256High Court2022#1249 most cited

What is 85 (Mumbai), CIT v. Harjeev Aggarwal authority for?

Additions under Section 68 for cash credits, such as share capital and share premium, are not sustainable if the assessee provides sufficient documentary evidence and the Assessing Officer fails to properly investigate the veracity of those documents. The Assessing Officer cannot merely rely on a recorded statement without undertaking due investigation.

90

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT vs Agson Global Pvt Ltd · 134 Taxmann.com 256 · Section 68 · cash credits · share capital · share premium · documentary evidence · Assessing Officer investigation · veracity of documents · unexplained income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 85 (Mumbai), CIT v. Harjeev Aggarwal