6. CIT v. Jasvinder Kaur

54 Taxmann.com 10High Court2015#2028 most cited

What is 6. CIT v. Jasvinder Kaur authority for?

Long-term capital gains claimed as exempt under Section 10(38) from the sale of penny stocks can be treated as bogus income if the revenue presents incriminating material demonstrating the transactions are a colourable device for accommodation entries.

57

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Jasvinder Kaur · Section 10(38) · Section 68 · bogus long term capital gain · penny stock · price rigging · accommodation entry · colourable device · incriminating material · assessment of capital gains

Sections most often in play

Section 10(38)Section 68Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 133(6)Section 147

Issues it is cited on

price riggingbogus ltcgbogus long term capital gainpenny stockcolourable devicesection 10(38)entry operatorlong term capital gainslong term capital gainaccommodation entrysection 10section 131

Judgments citing 6. CIT v. Jasvinder Kaur

BHAWNA KAPOOR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-62(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 632/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarsmt. Bhawna Kapoor Vs. Acit Prop M/S Manish Circle 62(1) Handicraft 1196, Main Delhi Bazar, Paharganj, New Delhi 110055 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Adxpk 3853 F Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Ramesh Chander, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 68Section 69A

…P a g e | 1 Bhawna Kapoor (AY 2014-15) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, DELHI BEFORE SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Smt. Bhawna Kapoor Vs. ACIT Prop M/s Manish Circle 62(1) Handicraft 1196, Main Delhi Bazar, Paharganj, New Delhi 110055 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: ADXPK 3853 F Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Sh. Ramesh Chander, Adv Respondent by : Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 29.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 09.04.2026 O R D E R PER VIMAL KUMAR, JM: The application for condonation of delay of 349 days in filing…

GYAN PRAKASH GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-10(4), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 6271/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarlate Gyan Prakash Gupta Vs. Ito Through Legal Heir Raj Ward 10(4) Kumari Gupta New Delhi Plot No.6 & 7, Defence Enclave, Laxmi Nagar, East Delhi 110092 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Adupg 2697 N Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Ajit Gandhi, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

…P a g e | 1 Gyan Prakash Gupta (AY 2015-16) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, DELHI BEFORE SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Late Gyan Prakash Gupta Vs. ITO through legal Heir Raj Ward 10(4) Kumari Gupta New Delhi Plot No.6 & 7, Defence Enclave, Laxmi Nagar, East Delhi 110092 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: ADUPG 2697 N Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Sh. Ajit Gandhi, Adv. Respondent by : Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 29.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 09.04.2026 O R D E R PER VIMAL KUMAR, JM: The appeal filed by the asse…

ABHISHEK TEJRAJ DOSHI,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2944/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Mar 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Bleabhishek Tejraj Doshi V. Income Tax Officer 259, 2Nd Floor, Johari Mansion Jurisdiction Circle 19(1), Kalbadevi Road, Kalbadevi Mumbai, Mumbai Mumbai 400002 Pan: Aegpd9279J (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Anil Sathe Assessee Represented By : Department Represented By : Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha

Section 10(38)Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “A” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Abhishek Tejraj Doshi v. Income Tax Officer 259, 2nd Floor, Johari Mansion Jurisdiction Circle 19(1), Kalbadevi Road, Kalbadevi Mumbai, Mumbai Mumbai 400002 PAN: AEGPD9279J (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Anil Sathe Assessee Represented by : Department Represented by : Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha Date of conclusion of Hearing : 12.03.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 20.03.2024 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM) 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against o…

JITENDRA UDAYLAL JAIN,MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE , DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2042/MUM/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Nov 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blejitendra Udaylal Jain V. National Faceless Assessment Centre(Nfac) C/O. M/S. Alankar Jewellers Shop Delhi No.1 Municipal Building R.A. Kidwai Road, Wadala Mumbai- 400037 Pan: Aabpj5480E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shri. Vimal Punmiya Department Represented By : Shri. Ujjawal Kumar Chavan

Section 10(38)Section 131Section 143(2)Section 148Section 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Jitendra Udaylal Jain v. National Faceless Assessment Centre(NFAC) C/o. M/s. Alankar Jewellers Shop Delhi No.1 Municipal Building R.A. Kidwai Road, Wadala Mumbai- 400037 PAN: AABPJ5480E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented by : Shri. Vimal Punmiya Department Represented by : Shri. Ujjawal Kumar Chavan Date of conclusion of Hearing : 11.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 24.11.2023 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM) 1. This appeal is…

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 56/CTK/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 May 2023AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Keshav Dubey, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, “एस.एम.सी” न्यायऩीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH CUTTACK श्री जाजज माथन, न्याययक सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं/ITA No.56/CTK/2023 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Rashi Agrawal, Vs ITO, Ward-1(1), Cuttack C/o: Ramesh Enterprises, At-Naya Sarak, PO: Chandni Chowk Cuttack-753002 PAN No. : AJGPG 2032 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Keshav Dubey, CA राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 04/05/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/…

JATIN GARG & SONS (HUF),NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-36(5), NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 5652/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

Section 143(2)Section 68

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “SMC”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 5652 /DEL/2018 [Assessment Year: 2015-16 Jatin Garg & Sons (HUF), Vs Income-tax Officer, C/0 Kapil Goel, Adv., Ward-36(5), New Delhi. F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, New Delhi-110085 PAN- AACHJ1265I APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by None Department represented by Shri Om Parkash Date of hearing 22.02.2023 Date of pronouncement 07.03.2023 O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, JM: This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-12, New…

SMT. MANJU AGRAWAL,BHARTPUR vs. ITO, BHARTPUR

In the result, the ground no

ITA 249/JPR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, JCIT
Section 10(38)

…1 आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC’’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 249/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2012-13 Smt. Manju Agarwal cuke The ITO Vs. 41/405, New Mandi Ward-1 Station Road, Bharatpur Bharatpur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AGYPA 2553 Q vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Rajendra Agarwal, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, JCIT lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date…

RUPESH VYAS,INDORE vs. THE ACIT3(1), INDORE, INDORE

In the result, this appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 909/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore07 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Conducted through Virtual Court) Shri Rupesh Vyas ACIT-3(1) Indore Indore Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) PAN: ACUPV 3307 M Assessee by None Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 18.10.2022 Date of Pronouncement 07.12.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 20.09.2018 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Indore [“Ld. CIT(A)”], wh…

PARMANAND SACHDEV,INDORE vs. ITO 5(5), INDORE

In the result, this appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 609/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Conducted through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Parmanand Sachdev ITO –Ward-5(5) बनाम Indore Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) /Vs. PAN: BDQPS 7324 K Assessee by None Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 18.10.2022 Date of Pronouncement 01.12.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 21.02.2019 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (A…

HARISH SHARMA HUF,B-1, PATODIYA MARG, SHASTRI NAGAR, JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-5(3), JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 318/JPR/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Nov 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Shri Chanchal Meena (JCIT)
Section 10(38)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’A’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM deys’k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 318/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2014-15 cuke Harish Sharma HUF ITO, Vs. B-1, Patodiya Marg, Ward-5(3), Shastri Nagar, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAEHH 0008 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri Cha…

SHRI ABHISHEK GUPTA,INDORE vs. ITO-5(5), INDORE

In the result, this appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 74/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Conducted through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Abhishek Gupta, ITO –Ward-5(5) 303, Sangeeta Apartment Indore बनाम 66, Bhagwandeen Nagar, Indore /Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) PAN: AGAPG4006E Assessee by Shri Shubhash Jain, AR Revenue by Shri R. S. Ambedkar / Shri Aditya Shukla, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 17.05.2022 / 21.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement 17.08.2022 आदेश / / / O R D E R / O R D E R O R…

SANGEETA BASAVRAJ MANGRULE,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, AURANGABAD

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 706/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Aug 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE SINGLE MEMBER CASE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 706/PUN/2019 : Assessment Year : 2015-16 Sangeeta B. Mangrule Plot No. 64, Mayurban Colony, Shahnoorwadi Darga Road, Aurangabad PAN: AJIPM 9153 H :Appellant Vs. The Asstt. CIT Cir. 2, Aurangabad : Respondent Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri M.G. Jasnani Date of Hearing : 28-07-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 11-08-2022 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16 arises against the CIT(A)- 2, Aurangabad’s order dated 07-02-2019 passed in case No. ABD/CIT(A)- 2/461/2017-18, involving proceedings u/s 143…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. HIMANSU MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 45/CTK/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. HIMANSU MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 44/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. DEEPANSU MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 43/CTK/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. DEEPANSU MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 42/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. ANUPAMA MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 41/CTK/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. ANUPAMA MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 40/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. SITANSU SEKHAR MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 38/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK vs. SMT. KUNTALA MOHAPATRA, BHADRAK

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 50/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

Showing 1–20 of 57 · Page 1 of 3