57 (Bombay (ii) Narsi Creations v. DCIT

70 Taxmann.com 156High Court2016#7979 most cited

What is 57 (Bombay (ii) Narsi Creations v. DCIT authority for?

Recording of a satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of the searched person is a mandatory prerequisite for assuming jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This requirement applies even when the Assessing Officer of the searched person and the 'other person' are the same.

14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2019.

Also referred to as

Narsi Creations v. DCIT · section 153C · satisfaction note · condition precedent · assessment of income of any other person · search and seizure · AO satisfaction · prerequisite for jurisdiction

Judgments citing 57 (Bombay (ii) Narsi Creations v. DCIT

Sesha Sai Township Pvt.Ltd., Hyderabad vs. The ACIT, Vijayawada

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 301/VIZ/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 Jan 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.301 & 302/Viz/2015 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2007-2008 & 2008-09) Sri Sesha Sai Township P. Ltd. Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.40-7-9/1, 1St Floor Income Tax Moghalrajpuram Road Central Circle Labbipet Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan : Aakcs2094K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri M.Chandramouleswara Rao, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri M.ChandramouleswaraFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153C

…Revenue as well as the assessee have no legs stand, since the assessments for both the years are quashed.” The assessee also relied on the decision of coordinate bench of ITAT, Delhi in the case of Narsi Creations Vs.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (2016) 70 Taxmann.com 156, wherein, the Coordinate Bench of ITAT held that the satisfaction of the AO of searched person has to record satisfaction even if he is also the AO of the other person u/s 153C. 13. Similar issue was considered by the coordinate bench of ITAT Ahmedabad in Parshwa Corporation. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income- 10 I.T.A. Nos.301&302/Viz/20…

Sesha Sai Township Pvt.Ltd., Hyderabad vs. The ACIT, Vijayawada

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 302/VIZ/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.301 & 302/Viz/2015 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2007-2008 & 2008-09) Sri Sesha Sai Township P. Ltd. Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.40-7-9/1, 1St Floor Income Tax Moghalrajpuram Road Central Circle Labbipet Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan : Aakcs2094K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri M.Chandramouleswara Rao, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri M.ChandramouleswaraFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153C

…Revenue as well as the assessee have no legs stand, since the assessments for both the years are quashed.” The assessee also relied on the decision of coordinate bench of ITAT, Delhi in the case of Narsi Creations Vs.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (2016) 70 Taxmann.com 156, wherein, the Coordinate Bench of ITAT held that the satisfaction of the AO of searched person has to record satisfaction even if he is also the AO of the other person u/s 153C. 13. Similar issue was considered by the coordinate bench of ITAT Ahmedabad in Parshwa Corporation. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income- 10 I.T.A. Nos.301&302/Viz/20…