DCIT-3(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. ECGC LIMITED, MUMBAI
In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed
ITA 3812/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Feb 2024AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, A.R. a/wFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, D.R
Section 10(38)Section 14ASection 234Section 234B
…concerns as laid down in section 10, but in quite a different manner." The view so token has been followed by this court in Pandyan Insurance Company Ltd. v. CIT [1965] 55 [TR 716 and CIT v. Calcutta Hospital and Nursing Home Benefits Association Lid. [1965] 57 ITR 313 (SC). In the later case, their Lordships have also observed (page 320). “....the balance of profits as disclosed by the accounts submitted to the superintendent of insurance and necepted by him would be binding on the Income-tax Officer, except that the Income-tax Officer would be entitled to exclude expenditure other than expenditure permissible…