49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekhal3anerjee v. CIT 2
20 Taxmann.com 462High Court2012#5546 most cited
What is 49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekhal3anerjee v. CIT 2 authority for?
A High Court judgment that cites Sreelekha Banerjee v. CIT (1963) 49 ITR 112 (SC) implies that the assessing officer's addition was justified, particularly if the assessee failed to provide crucial information such as the names and addresses of depositors and beneficiaries.
21
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2023.
Also referred to as
Sreelekha Banerjee v. CIT · 49 ITR 112 SC · 20 taxmann.com 462 · addition deletion · depositors names · beneficiaries names · assessing officer finding · AO
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekhal3anerjee v. CIT 2
Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2