44 (Del) 6. PCIT v. Hitech Residency P Ltd.
96 Taxmann.com 402High Court2018#3233 most cited
What is 44 (Del) 6. PCIT v. Hitech Residency P Ltd. authority for?
The Assessing Officer cannot make additions under Section 68 for unsecured loans if the assessee provides sufficient evidence of identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the lenders, particularly when payments are made through banking channels. The Assessing Officer must consider such evidence and cannot unilaterally make additions.
37
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.
Also referred to as
PCIT v. Hitech Residency P Ltd · section 68 · unsecured loan addition · source of source · identity of lender · creditworthiness of lender · genuineness of lender · banking channel · audited financial statements · assessee burden of proof
Also reported as
257 Taxmann 390
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 44 (Del) 6. PCIT v. Hitech Residency P Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 37 · Page 1 of 2